Iron Lung Exhibit

Hi ho, hi ho,

it’s off to the Texas Capitol I go, to hand the following to the people manning The Immunization Partnership’s iron lung exhibit – complete with one of the monster machines on display:

The only reason we no longer see the iron lung is because it was replaced years ago by the ventilator, used today by thousands.

Fact: the government radically changed the diagnostic parameters of polio right after the Salk vaccine was released, automatically eliminating 90% of subsequent diagnoses – 30,000 cases a year we were told and are still led to believe were prevented by the vaccine.

That’s not disease eradication – that’s a con game.

In 1954, the year the Salk vaccine was licensed, if you experienced paralysis for 24 hours you’d be diagnosed with polio. *No lab analysis was required*. Beginning in 1955, you had to be paralyzed for 60 days to warrant the diagnosis. If you were paralyzed for 59 days and then recovered (the majority of polio cases recovered within a few weeks) you would not be diagnosed with polio, *even if lab analysis determined you had the poliovirus*. This flies in the face of virology. They could have easily set the parameter to 90 days, and eliminated another 5% of diagnoses – how haphazard!, and what a demonstration of the power our supposed public health authorities have over our beliefs. Without those severe diagnostic changes, upwards of a million cases of polio would have been diagnosed over the last sixty years, but we’re told the vaccine prevented them.

The CDC sculpts public perception with the point of a pen.

There are currently diagnosed on an annual basis in the U.S. thousands of cases of aseptic / viral meningitis, Guillian-Barré syndrome, acute flaccid paralysis and a variety of other diseases which carry flaccid paralysis among their symptoms. Pre-Salk vaccine, these would all have been labeled polio.

This is about coercion of the worst kind, using your fear for the health of your child. Using the power of the media, the vaccine industry – government, manufacturers and to some degree, the medical establishment – terribly misrepresented both the extent and threat of polio during the 40s and early 50s, creating a mounting public fear and accompanying clamor for a vaccine. Since the advent of the vaccine, what is in reality the illusion of its success has been used as a banner of the industry, to motivate the uptake of all vaccines. The same type of deception is rampant throughout the industry, and fuels the paradigm. The first step toward thwarting the deception is to become aware of it.

For references related to all the above, email to the address below.

Grandparents for Vaccine Truth
TheVaccineMyth@gmail.com

Bombshell: sacrificing children to the state of California: SB18

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/12/15/bombshell-sacrificing-children-to-the-state-of-california-sb18/

Bam.

It’s a non-profit that has assets of $7.3 BILLION. It runs 1800 philanthropic funds. Here are some of its corporate partners:

Alexza Pharmaceuticals. Microsoft. Pepsico Foundation. Cisco. Hewlett Packard. Dell. Symantec. Unilever. Plus something called the SV2 Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund, “building and scaling social inventions.”

For some reason, this huge Foundation is pushing a children’s bill of rights that is reflected in a new CA bill, SB18, that will eventually make the State the top-dog controlling force over all children in California.

From the beginning:

Bombshell: sacrificing children to the state of California: SB18

Bombshell: Sacrificing children to the state of California: SB18

Watch out for the big money behind this operation: it’s the secret

by Jon Rappoport

December 15, 2016

This article is dedicated to Patrick Wood, author of Technocracy Rising, a book everyone should read. Yesterday.

A bill introduced by the notorious Richard Pan, the mover and shaker behind the mandatory vaccination law in CA—this new one, SB18, is a grab-bag of generalities basically giving over care of children to the State.

Catch the flavor of the wording. It emerges like swamp gas:

“The Legislature finds and declares that all children and youth, regardless of gender, class, race, ethnicity, national origin, culture, religion, immigration status, sexual orientation, or ability, have inherent rights that entitle them to protection, special care, and assistance, including, but not limited to, the following: The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest. The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being. The right to live in a safe and healthy environment. The right to social and emotional well-being. The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development. The right to appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood. The right to appropriate, quality health care.”

As if all these outcomes could be delivered to children on a silver platter.

And the State would make it so.

This bill is basically setting up the population of California for state regulatory agencies to fill in the blanks later, to make specific controls out of the vague generalities in the bill. Get it?

“Medical care and nutrition and parenting and education are what we say they are. We define and enforce, you obey.”

SB18 is also an invitation to immigrants anywhere in the world who can get to California with their children, or will give birth to children after arriving: “Just be here and we’ll take care of you.”

But let’s go to the money. In SB18, a group is referred to: the Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council (when you go to “Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 80” referenced in SB18):

Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 80 (Res. Ch. 101, Stats. 2009) declares the Legislature’s support of a Bill of Rights for the Children and Youth of California that resolves to invest in all children and youth in order to achieve specified goals to create an optimal environment for their healthy development.”

This Council has already written a children’s bill of rights, and SB18 is saying this is the model. This is the framework. This the pattern they’re following.

That’s odd.

Pay attention. This is where it becomes VERY interesting.

The Peninsula Partnership is a group organized within the San Mateo County Office of Education. One piddling little California county education department.

The Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council (PPLC) is composed of the San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools, the County Board of Supervisors and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.

And now we hit pay dirt: THE SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION.

Bam.

It’s a non-profit that has assets of $7.3 BILLION. It runs 1800 philanthropic funds. Here are some of its corporate partners:

Alexza Pharmaceuticals. Microsoft. Pepsico Foundation. Cisco. Hewlett Packard. Dell. Symantec. Unilever. Plus something called the SV2 Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund, “building and scaling social inventions.”

For some reason, this huge Foundation is pushing a children’s bill of rights that is reflected in a new CA bill, SB18, that will eventually make the State the top-dog controlling force over all children in California.


You can bet these corporate partners will reap profits. Beyond that, this is their version of a MASSIVE social engineering program. And that program is part of a technocratic movement to plan, format, and run the lives of the population from cradle to grave, because…

The hi-tech scientists and engineers know best.

It’s that stark.

They should rule the future because they can plot and chart it out, based on their version (you weren’t consulted) of “greatest good for the greatest number.”

The best place to start? THE CHILDREN.

This is TECHNOCRACY INC. at work.

This is what’s behind SB18, and none of the hi-tech giants see a problem at all. All they see is a “scientific” solution that’s best for everyone.

They’re taking new steps and leading us into the promised land.

This is the big picture, and it’s bigger than any election or political party. It’s THE PLANNED SOCIETY.

It absolutely ignores your freedom or independent choice.

Jon Rappoport

To all of those hypocrites screaming COMMUNITY IMMUNITY I ask…..

WAKE UP PEOPLE WORLDWIDE. YOU HAVE BEEN AND CONTINUE TO BE PLAYED FOR A FOOL IF YOU BELIEVE INJECTING POISONS INTO A BODY WILL DO ANYTHING BUT HARM IT.

To all of those hypocrites screaming COMMUNITY IMMUNITY I ask “Where is your COMMUNITY when a mother like this needs help after sacrificing her child for your theoretical safety?” These are the fallen SOLDIERS of the PRO VACCINE WAR and you do nothing but ridicule them as you kick them aside. You better start praying that there is no God to judge you. – Del Bigtree

Robert B Choate and Karilyn Brown: the heated passion

The Arkansas representative who sponsored the vaccine mandate legislation was having conversation on a doctor’s page a short time ago, and both were complaining about the rage being directed at her over the last couple of days. So I shared my thoughts with them both on why they are getting that rage:

Robert B Choate and Karilyn Brown: the heated passion happens for a few reasons. 1) A lot of parents have vaccine injured children and since doctors brush off these injuries as “coincidence” or “normal” and often refuse to recognize them as such, the idea that they will no longer be able to avoid them with such proposed legislation absolutely enrages them. You are hearing and feeling the wrath of unmitigated rage because you are directly putting their children in danger. Recognize this. 2) Many parents have reviewed “vaccine science” and have concluded that a healthy natural operating immune system is superior to vaccination – for many, many reasons – and do not want poisonous ingredients injected into their children to produce a false sense of security wherein the product itself is not only inherently unsafe, but also does not always work (e.g., vaccine failure) – these parents do not want the government interfering with their child’s immune system. And finally, 3) vaccine mandates rest on a concept of “herd immunity” yet the original concept for herd immunity is from when a person *naturally* gets an infection – not a vaccination; and vaccine manufacturers have continually upped the vaccine coverage required for their vaccine program to actually “work” and parents don’t like that the government has bought into this hype. Let me ask you: is there any other product on this planet that you can think of that requires the entire population to use in order for it to “work?” What would it look like if all people had to buy a Toyota Camry in order for it to finally function properly on the road – don’t you find that quite absurd? Karilyn, I hope you can look past the rage coming at you and review the information in a calm manner. Lot’s of parents go vaccine free for many reasons. I’l leave you with a couple hundred here on my website: www.StopMandatoryVaccination.com

*****************

So the doctor – Robert B Choate – that supports the Arkansas bill for vaccine mandates, said “Anti-vaxxers are a cult.” So I posted this as a reply to his comment:

“What we find the most “cultish” of all are doctors who are so into the vaccination program that they tell parents that the problem their child is suffering from immediately after a vaccination is either a “coincidence” or “normal.” How could seizures after vaccination ever be considered “normal?” The vaccination cult has produced medically arrogant and willfully ignorant doctors who have thrown their common sense to the wind. Thank god parents are rising to the occasion and are fighting back against the destruction of their children by an industry that rewards itself and its administrators while punishing parents and their vaccine injured kids. We are growing in numbers, and one day everyone will know just how destructive the vaccine program really is.”

*****************

Larry Cook

Great news! Arkansas representative Karilyn Brown – who introduced a bill for mandatory vaccination – will withdraw her bill. She heard us, and reversed her stance.

*****************

That doctor in Arkansas who agrees with vaccine mandates finally started to reply to me. Well, he’s 100% closed minded, and wants nothing at all to hear our side. So I wrote this to him:

“Robert B Choate: I can tell you have your mind made up. Not that I didn’t already know that. This is the precise reason why we are mobilizing and have been mobilizing to steer parents far away from doctors who refuse to listen to their concerns, especially when it comes to vaccination. If only you would talk with your Integrative MD peers – and especially those who actually work to repair the vaccine damage – maybe you would learn the mechanism of action of how vaccines damage the brain and body and then how and why these other MDs then need to spend years detoxing and repairing the children harmed by vaccines. It’s truly amazing to me how one group of doctors is injecting ingredients into children that harm them while another group is doing all the work to repair those children. It’s astonishing to me.”

His response? This:
“Thank you for steering away close minded parents.”

Can I see a show of hands who would want to steer clear of him?

********************

One other thing that the doctor in Arkansas said to me:

“no physician would say that seizures are normal. I am a parent of 4 children and 3 grand children, but I have knowledge too. there is no conspiracy”

I asked him to watch my video of parents stating exactly that – what the doctors told them. His response?

“I don’t troll the internet to find people to agree with me. I take care of my patients”

Yep, I stand by my earlier assessment: these doctors are medically arrogant and WILLFULLY IGNORANT of what’s going on around them. We need to stay clear of these doctors, at all costs.

******************

Last week I filed HB 1043, a bill that would remove the provision for immunization exemption based on religious and philosophical beliefs.

I filed HB 1043 as a result of a request from a person who was sincerely concerned about the low immunization rate in Arkansas.

Since filing the bill, I have heard from numerous concerned citizens on both sides of this issue. I would like to say thank you to everyone who has communicated with me over the past few days.

HB 1043 addresses an important public health issue, but it intersects with personal freedoms that all Americans hold so dear. There appear to be valid arguments on each side of this issue.

I have determined that this issue is best left in the hands of public health officials working with health care providers and individual citizens who have an interest in and experience with this issue.

For these reasons, I have made a decision to withdraw HB1043 from consideration in the 2017 Regular Session. There is not a mechanism for me to withdraw this bill until the Arkansas Legislature convenes on January 9, 2017. At that time, I will take the necessary steps to withdraw HB 1043.

Comments
Jennifer Bhala Hansen
Jennifer Bhala Hansen Thank you for realizing the bill HB 1043 was basically supporting medical tyranny of the worst kind. Not having the freedom to decide on what happens to your own body or that of your child, whom you created out of love, is complete slavery. Thanks for withdrawing it. It also ignores God’s power and love for his creation that includes a magnificent immune system, which by it’s function alone, is the only way a human or animal body can be healed. Caring for the immune system is our best way to stay healthy, not destroying it with poisons.

The Evil Offit Admits Medical Schools do NOT teach about vaccines

No, we do not just go on internet to learn about vaccines. There was no internet when my kids were injured by vaccines. All we did was give our kids a vaccine because we trusted doctors BUT then saw the immediate results. Injury. The proof was cause and effect in front of our eyes.

Incompetent Minor – this is the original problem.

This is what it is really all about – The bottom line – The error was asking the state for a marriage license. – Please read entire document but begin on page 10 with Family Ties. http://www.teamlaw.net/Warn1.pdf – Now I don’t necessarily agree with every word printed here on this or other articles but for the most part, this does describe how we got to this point. Civics being removed from school curriculum hastening the reduction of knowledge of our rights as a people making it easier to mislead the populous. Just asking the govt. for a marriage license gives them the power to own your children. If you have to ask the govt. for a license to marry, you are considered to be incompetent to make any decisions of your own therefore incompetent to look after your children, in the eyes of the law. Very simple logic on their part that we must, as a people understand where they are coming from so we can do something about it. The lawyers helping fight this must come from this angle which is common law, not what they have been taught. Common law is the supreme law of the land and if presented properly always wins. The marriage contract the state told you was required is a tort of deceit in contract law and voids their misrepresented contract.

Marriage

In America, people with children are usually married — with a corporate state granted marriage license. Now, everybody knows that a license is “permission to do something that would otherwise be illegal”; and, Where Common Law or better yet, Natural Law marriages are lawfully recognized in every state, it is not otherwise illegal to be married without a license.

Do you remember how you first learned about common law marriages. I was walking to school with a friend. A new family had just moved into the neighborhood and my friend told me they had a common law marriage. I asked, “What’s that?” My friend said it meant they lived together in sin for over seven years, so now their marriage was legal. Most of us learned about marriage from parents, churches, or from school. But, did we learn the whole truth?

The truth is “common law” means the law that is common among the people. We can know what that is by looking at the court rulings among a people and common law is the way the courts rule on the cases before them. Thus another name for common law is standard case law. The seven year rule in common law is actually Biblical. It’s a property law called the “Law of Jubilee”, which says that every seven years (grand jubilee = 50 years) all debts are forgiven, and whatever has been called something for seven years, or more, is what it was called. Though a responsibility in marriage is proven by jubilee, that is not the only limit of natural law marriages. Natural law marriage is defined by “agreement” and “consent”. Jubilee proves the existence of both agreement and consent, because if no one contests the union within seven years jubilee says all contest rights are waived; therefore, any necessary consent was granted by tacit admission.

In a natural law marriage the “agreement” is between the spouses to be — they must agree to be married. “Consent” comes from the father of the bride. He must agree to give his daughter to the bridegroom. Under natural law, if a couple has both agreement and consent they are, by definition, married. That’s all there is to it. The moment agreement and consent are in place the bride and groom are married, and that marriage can lawfully be consummated. Marriages often result in the creation of children. Children are created “in the image of God.” Therefore, such a union is sacred and often tied to a great deal of ceremony, religion, pomp, and circumstance.

Marriage License

Whereas, “license” means, permission to do that which would otherwise be illegal’; and,

Whereas, it is not otherwise illegal to be married under the law; and,

Whereas, the only other reason it would be unlawful for two consenting adults to be married is if they were otherwise incompetent;

Therefore, if a couple goes to “the state” and asks the state for a license, where there is no other reason for them to need a license other than incompetence, in law, those requesting a license must be incompetent because that is the only reason they could possibly need a license.

Now, one must ask, “When a bride and groom are incompetent to be married without a state license and that state grants that license,

Who is responsible for the marriage?” Answer: The grantor, the state.

Who is responsible for anything created in such a licensed marriage? Answer: The grantor, the state.

And, what, typically, is the only thing “created” in such a marriage? Answer: Children.

So I ask you, “Who do the children created in a state licensed marriage belong to?” Answer: They belong to the state.

Believe it, or not. Just check out the evidence:

Evidence #1 — The state social services stand their authority on a doctrine called “Parens Patriae” which is Latin for “parent by the country”. In modern usage parens patriae is understood to mean “the state is the parent”.

Evidence #2 — When U.S. doctors deliver children from the womb they are required to create a document known as a: Record of Live Birth. Is it given to you? No. You’re given a: Birth Certificate. So, what happens to the Record of Live Birth? It’s sent to the, “BUREAU OF VITAL STATISTICS”. And, what is that? It is a sub department of the, “Department of Commerce”. And, what is the, “Department of Commerce”. It is where the U.S. keeps track of its possessions. This evidence indicates that the state is declaring the children as their possession at birth.

Evidence #3 — New statutes, policies and or procedures require hospitals to assign Social Security Numbers to each child before birth, with or without the natural parents signature or permission. (read “Independence Day” in this issue)

Evidence #4 — Why are each of the childbirth performing hospitals in the U.S. registered as “Ports of Entry” into the U.S. when virtually none of them have incoming foreigners?

Evidence #5 — Birth records and Census reports are used as collateral for U.S. loans and as proof of the subservient nature of the people under control of the U.S. government. It’s Scary. It’s proof of the war. It’s fulfillment of Biblical prophesy. And, if we don’t do something to change things we’ll have no promise from the King of Kings (other than judgment).

So what do we do? First we learn what happened. In times past, there were no licenses of marriage except in cases where it was unlawful to otherwise marry. For example, Biblical Law shows God sanctions marriage and forbids intermarriage of races. Therefore, the contract of marriage is traditionally bound by a religious ceremony provided by an official minister; and, the laws of the land forbade miscegenation. So, when a white person wanted to marry a black, if the state was willing on request, it would license miscegenation with a marriage license. Marriage records were kept in family Bibles, then with the advent of licenses, in the County Clerk and Recorder’s offices. Statutes were created to allow anyone desiring a license to obtain one. Churches were used to assist in getting people to use marriage licenses as a manner of recording marriages. Over time, people began to believe licenses were required by law, even though they were only required if you were otherwise incompetent to marry. Now, remember, the promise given to Israel was, if we maintain our stewardship, we’ll inherit the earth. Our stewardship starts with our families.

Isn’t it ironic that the document typically used to begin a marriage is the same document used by the corporate state to remove our children from us?

And, nobody ever even warned us, because government employees were just doing their jobs. Whenever we discover we’ve erred, we can repent. The error was asking the state for a marriage license. Repenting includes fixing the damage. Some people would tell you, ‘To remove the marriage license you have to revoke or rescind your signature from the request for the license.’ However, as a matter of law, revoking or rescinding a signature admits you signed it in the first place. What if you never signed the request for license? Then there would be no license in existence. In contract law there is no signature if full disclosure is not given with presentment of the agreement.

In the case of most marriage licenses, the state does not inform:

  1. The grantor of the license is a privately owned corporation;
  2. Licensing with them wasn’t necessary for the marriage;
  3. Requesting a license constitutes a declaration of incompetence; and,
  4. Signing such a license admits the state is the responsible parent of your future children, and will be used by them as state collateral.

Therefore, if any of the above points are true in your case, then the contracting license is void and without a lawful signature, from the beginning.

So what about your marriage? Legal & Lawful Marriage? Well think about it. If the two of you went to get a “required” license, you must have had agreement. And, if you had her father’s blessing you had his consent and therefore under Natural Law (Biblical Law) you were married without the license before the license was issued.

The churches rightfully want people to have “legal and lawful” marriages.

A natural law marriage is a “lawful” marriage, meaning it fulfills law. The accent in the lawful marriage is the fact that the parties of the marriage have an agreement, they have the fathers consent and they are bound by their acceptance of, and consummation of, the marriage.

A “legal” marriage indicates a written contract of marriage. The written legal record for a legal marriage evidences the authority the marriage was bound by.

All you have to do to make a lawful natural law marriage “legal and lawful” is, make a legal record of the union made under natural law. In other words, if you legally record your contract of marriage with the County Clerk and Recorder. Such a record is a legal record and the natural law marriage is both a lawful fact and a matter of legal record; thus, “legal and lawful”. Even if your original marriage agreement was verbal, you can later legally reduce it to writing and make it binding from the first moment of your agreement and consent by making your contract “nunc pro tunc”, which means, “now as if then”.

Knowing these things prior to marriage brings on some interesting questions especially if you or the father of the bride have religious beliefs (like I do) that cause you to desire to go through an ecclesiastic leader that may be unaware of the truth and therefore believes you have to have a state issued marriage license. The solution is simple. If it was me, I would obey the law. With agreement and consent, I would:

1/ create a Notice of Marriage stating: I and my spouse to be have an agreement to marry,

2/ show we have consent of the bride’s father, and,

3/ give notice of the intended ceremony which when performed will bind, seal and/or begin the Marriage union.

4/I would have all related parties sign the document.

5/ I would then go to the County Clerk and Recorder’s office and legally record the Notice with the marriage licenses.

6/ I would then get a couple of state certified copies of the Notice.

7/ I would take a state certified copy to the ecclesiastic leader as evidence of the legal right to lawfully marry.

In Law your Notice has a greater authority than the state issued marriage license. The authority you will be using is the authority of natural law in original jurisdiction, as was endowed upon man by birth.

It is the same authority and power that makes you sovereign. It follows law. The Notice is in accord with the laws of the individual states and is binding.

Taking your Family back

This problem started many years ago. It won’t be removed overnight. The state took charge of our stewardships because we signed the agreement and or allowed it. People are a great source of wealth. If the state can convince you that you are under their control, as their asset or subject, then you won’t control them.

We are living with alleged contractual bonds to parens patria, and we have been doing so in condemnation for at least three generations. It’s time we recognized the truth. It’s time to take responsibility for our families, our stewardships and our lives. Removing the marriage license won’t remove the entire problem in and of itself. It will, however, remove the foundation upon which the state builds its entire “parens patria” doctrine. With the state’s foundation removed you’ve taken the

first step to prepare for any battle that may come up where the state attempts to use social workers, or other forces, to interfere with your family rights. You’ll be beginning to act like the sovereign you are. If your marriage is not made under their authority, they have no lawful right to interfere with your family unless you invite them to.

Step two: Stop inviting them to solve your family problems. Be self reliant. It doesn’t mean they won’t ever interfere. It does mean that if they do you’ve disarmed their #1 weapon from their presumption. You’ll need to learn more and to prepare to turn back any attack they bring against you, but foundationally you’ll be ready. Even after we resolve our marriages, the problem is, the system that set up the parens patria system of control still exists and government officials still want us to believe we are their incompetent servants. We need to solve that problem by eliminating the incompetence; thus, Step three: You’re sovereign and therefore you’re responsible, so start acting like it.

Learn the Law — Obey and apply it, and when others trespass against you or yours, mercifully and justly hold them accountable to their trespasses. Accountability is the key. If you’ll do it you’ll be well on the path to true freedom and liberty, and we’ll get our nation back. Team Law can help. That’s why we’re here, to help people wake up and learn the law. Re-tie Family Ties Typically for about the same reasons we had the marriage license problem we have the problem of raising our children in that same system that taught us we needed to have the marriage license.

That system wanted us to be incompetent workers providing all of the “government’s needs”, believing the “government” was supposed to provide our needs. When in reality we are responsible for providing all of our own needs and government’s responsibility is to govern itself and help us maintain our rights and property, without trespass.

The question is, “What are we allowing that system to teach our children?” Perhaps the question should be, “Why are we allowing that system to teach our children?” You don’t have to take your children out of the public school system. Though many have, successfully. However, if your children remain in the public school system, you must take an active part. At the very least pay attention to what your children are learning. I’m not referring to the school’s alleged subject matter, I’m referring to the public school’s end results: drugs, immorality, codependency and crime. You decide what’s best for your children. After all, ultimately, when it comes time for you to stand accountable for your stewardship, you won’t be able to blame the school for the outcome. After all, you are the sovereign.

See full articles here: http://www.teamlaw.net/Warn1.pdf