Top 10 reasons for outpatient clinic visits – number of visits – Seattle Children’s Hospital

So the recent post about Seattle Children’s Hospital reminded me of these SOBERING statistics from their fiscal year 2014.

Top 10 reasons for outpatient clinic visits – number of visits

Autism: 11,283
Anxiety: 9,966
ADHD: 8,979
Feeding problem: 6,073
Behavioral problem: 5,733
Pain in limb: 5,284
Diabetes: 5,269
Depressive disorder: 5,252
Abdominal pain: 5,156
Obstructive sleep apnea: 5,084

Not only is AUTISM #1 but #2,3,4 and 5.

Actually, ALL of these can and most often do, go along with AUTISM. No one finds this a problem?

I don’t see any childhood diseases listed anywhere. Why are we focusing on ficticious “epidemics” when we have some REAL “epidemics” right in our face?

AND then we’ve got (excuse me I usually don’t resort to name calling) MORON DOCTOR saying they don’t know what causes AUTISM but they certainly know what doesn’t. http://seattlemamadoc.seattlechildrens.org/no-controversy-…/Maxwell Keri

Merck Created Hit List to “Destroy,” “Neutralize” or “Discredit” Dissenting Doctors

Merck Created Hit List to “Destroy,” “Neutralize” or “Discredit” Dissenting Doctors

Last Updated May 6, 2009 7:38 PM EDT

Merck made a “hit list” of doctors who criticized Vioxx, according to testimony in a Vioxx class action case in Australia. The list, emailed between Merck employees, contained doctors’ names with the labels “neutralise,” “neutralised” or “discredit” next to them.

According to The Australian, Merck emails from 1999 showed company execs complaining about doctors who disliked using Vioxx. One email said:

We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live …

The plaintiffs’ lawyer gave this assessment:

It gives you the dark side of the use of key opinion leaders and thought leaders … if (they) say things you don’t like to hear, you have to neutralise them … It does suggest a certain culture within the organisation about how to deal with your opponents and those who disagree with you.

The Australian:

The court was told that James Fries, professor of medicine at Stanford University, wrote to the then Merck head Ray Gilmartin in October 2000 to complain about the treatment of some of his researchers who had criticised the drug.

“Even worse were allegations of Merck damage control by intimidation,” he wrote, … “This has happened to at least eight (clinical) investigators … I suppose I was mildly threatened myself but I never have spoken or written on these issues.”

The allegations come on the heels of revelations that Merck created a fake medical journal — the Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine — in which to publish studies about Vioxx; had pop songs commissioned about Vioxx to inspire its staff, and paid ghostwriters to draft articles about the drug.

See original article here: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/merck-created-hit-list-to-destroy-neutralize-or-discredit-dissenting-doctors/

Mother Faces Down Swat Team & Tank For Refusing to Drug Daughter – Judge Orders it is Parents Right to Make Medical Decisions for Their Children

Look at the lengths Pig pHARMa will go to to be in control of a person’s child. Sickening. Thank you to the judge. Love to you Sir.

Read Maryanne’s full story here http://bit.ly/11BpgMj

The Antipsychotic drugs Detroit mother Maryanne Godboldo refused to give her daughter are extremely dangerous with 55 drug regulatory agency warnings of diabetes, seizures, mania, psychosis, hallucinations, death and 77 studies on antipsychotic induced side effects including diabetes, seizures, coma, violence, psychosis, and homicidal ideation and death. Maryanne Godboldo made international press when she faced down a Swat team and a tank after she refused to administer an antipsychotic drug which clearly could endanger her child’s life. And hers is not an isolated case. Parents have been charged with medical neglect for refusing to administer dangerous drugs to their child, despite the fact that the “mental disorders” for which the drugs are prescribed, cannot be MEDICALLY proven to exist. It is an oxymoron to charge medical neglect, without medical proof of abnormality. It is criminal to force a parent to administer drugs documented to cause life-threatening effects by drug regulatory agencies around the world. For more information go to http://www.cchrint.org
and death. Her story made international press, yet hers is far from an isolated case.

*****************************************

Continue reading Mother Faces Down Swat Team & Tank For Refusing to Drug Daughter – Judge Orders it is Parents Right to Make Medical Decisions for Their Children

Police confirm body found was missing Dr. Nadeera De Silva of Old Buckenham

“The body of Dr Nadeera De Silva was discovered on a patch of land at Old Buckenham, near Attleborough, on Thursday after he had been reported missing.

Yesterday police confirmed his identity and said his death was not being treated as suspicious. (Editor’s notes – how can they say that?)

Dr De Silva, was a clinical researcher at the MRC Cancer Unit linked to the University of Cambridge.

The 34-year-old was reported missing from his home address in Old Buckenham on Monday, March 7, and his body was discovered off Doe Lane by a member of the public on Thursday, March 10.

Nadeera De Silva. ANL-160803-113700001

Nadeera De Silva. ANL-160803-113700001

A spokesperson for Norfolk Police said a post mortem examination has proved inconclusive and further tests will now be carried out.

Officers are not treating the death as suspicious at this time and a file will be prepared for the coroner in due course, they added.

On behalf of the cancer unit, a university spokesman said: ‘He was a caring and skillful oncologist and, in the third year of his PhD, was already making a great contribution to cancer research, investigating new methods for blood monitoring and treatment for cancer of the oesophagus.

He was above all, a valued colleague and friend who had an open, kind and generous personality and a wonderful laugh. Our thoughts are with his friends and family.’”

Reported missing on Monday, March 7th, his body was discovered on March 10th. A Norfolk Police spokesperson reported that as the initial examination was inconclusive, further tests will now be carried out.

Read more: http://www.dissexpress.co.uk/news/latest-news/police-confirm-body-found-was-missing-nadeera-de-silva-of-old-buckenham-1-7278129#ixzz43TKFn7QI

Concordia professor condemns HPV vaccine after winning $270K federal grant to study it

The two types of HPV vaccine now on the market have been shown effective at preventing strains of the virus that cause 70% of cervical cancer, as well as some other cancers.

A Montreal social scientist and the federal agency that awarded her almost $300,000 to study the HPV vaccine are facing criticism after the professor condemned the vaccine and called for a moratorium on its use.

Concordia University’s Genevieve Rail also said there is no proof that the human papillomavirus directly causes cervical cancer, though a German scientist was awarded the Nobel Prize five years ago for discovering the link.

Experts say Rail’s public attacks are seriously misinformed and risk undermining an important public-health program — and they question why the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) would fund her work. Continue reading Concordia professor condemns HPV vaccine after winning $270K federal grant to study it

Indiana General Assembly 2016 Session – Hospital employee immunizations. Your Votes and Calls needed

Indiana: Call your reps!!!

In Indiana, SB162 just passed the full senate with a vote of 50 to 0 and is off to the house.

From National Vaccine Information Center:

SB 162 , vaccine mandates for hospital employees, passed the full senate on 2/2/16 by vote of 50 yes and 0 no. The bill is now in the house pending committee assignment.

SB 162 was amended and has become a much worse bill. The amended version that passed:

— Eliminates the personal belief exemption.

— Restricts the religious exemption by allowing a hospital to establish a process for determining whether the tenets of the religion relied upon by an individual for purposes of a religious exemption would prohibit the individual from receiving an immunization.

— Restricts the medical exemption to medically contraindicated.

— Allows employees to be fired and protects the hospital or agent from any liability for firing an individual.

Senate Bill (H)

Third level navigation links – accordion

DIGEST

Hospital employee immunizations. Requires a hospital, beginning January 1, 2017, to administer or make available to be administered certain immunizations to hospital employees or contractors who routinely have direct contact with a patient of the hospital. Allows a hospital to elect to annually administer or make available certain immunizations to other employees and contractors. Provides for exceptions. Allows a hospital to establish a process for determining whether the tenets of the religion relied upon for an exemption prohibit the individual from receiving the immunization. Authorizes a hospital, if the hospital has a written policy in place before the individual’s failure to receive the immunization, to: (1) make as a condition of employment or a contract an individual having an immunization; and (2) terminate an employee or contractor for not obtaining the immunization if the employee or contractor does not qualify for an exemption. Provides for immunity for the hospital.

Vaccines – news from NY, NC, IL, France, flu shots for dogs…

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thevaccineagenda/2016/01/05/vaccines-news-from-ny-nc-il-france-flu-shots-for-dogs

Join Vaccine Rights Attorney Alan Phillips, J.D. as he discusses recent vaccine news including a New York legislator’s hands in the pharmaceutical money pot, flu shots for pregnant women, 13 cases of whooping cough in vaccinated students in NC, the significant increase in anti-vaxxers in France over a 5 year period, flu shots for dogs in Chicago, expert opinions about the true agenda of those at the top of WHO agencies and pharmaceutical companies, and more!

Email Attorney Phillips at attorney@vaccinerights.com during the week and listen to your answer live on the air or in the archives.

Find vaccine studies at vaccineresearchlibrary.com, and

sign up for the Vaccine Rights E-Newsletter at vaccinerights.com/newslettersignup.html, and

listen to ad-free archives at the new Vaccine Rights YouTube Channel.

Kathryn Scarborough, VISA ~ Australia Vaccination Targeting Poor ~ Host, Sallie O. Elkordy

Published on Jul 30, 2015

Kathryn Scarborough, Vaccination Information Serving Australia http://visainfo.org.au
Sallie O. Elkordy, Host http://BillionToddlerMarchForSurvival…

Playlist: Vaccine Truth Australia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVMMP…

VISA – Vaccination Information Serving Australia https://facebook.com/VisaVaccinationI… & http://whatisvaccination.com

Thanks Karen Johnston of Vaccination Information Network (VINE) https://facebook.com/vaccinationinfor…

Sallie O. Elkordy, Host of “The Mary and Sallie Show”

Zika virus was first identified in 1947 in a sentinel monkey that was being used to monitor for the presence of yellow fever virus in the Zika Forest of Uganda.

Buy Zika Virus freeze dried for $516 below.

Nothing here about shrunken baby heads; Must be the mandated dtap for brazillian pregnant women that is the real cause but using Zika as the excuse.  See more here: http://www.jimstone.is/zika.html

ZIKA WHO

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/01/29/zika-freakout-the-hoax-and-the-covert-op-continue/

http://www.virology.ws/2016/01/28/zika-virus/

Zika virus

FlavivirusThe rapid spread of Zika virus through the Americas, together with the association of infection with microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome, have propelled this previously ignored virus into the limelight. What is this virus and where did it come from?

 

History
Zika virus was first identified in 1947 in a sentinel monkey that was being used to monitor for the presence of yellow fever virus in the Zika Forest of Uganda. At this time cell lines were not available for studying viruses, so serum from the febrile monkey was inoculated intracerebrally into mice. All the mice became sick, and the virus isolated from their brains was called Zika virus. The same virus was subsequently isolated from Aedes africanus mosquitoes in the Zika forest.

Serological studies done in the 1950s showed that humans carried antibodies against Zika virus, and the virus was isolated from humans in Nigeria in 1968.

Continue reading Zika virus was first identified in 1947 in a sentinel monkey that was being used to monitor for the presence of yellow fever virus in the Zika Forest of Uganda.

Vaccines and “Vaccine-Preventable” Disease Research

Vaccines and “Vaccine-Preventable” Disease Research

Included in this document:

  • Pharmaceutical Corporation Information
  • Vaccine Ingredients
  • CDC List of Ingredients In Each Brand of Vaccine
  • “Did you know” Facts Regarding Vaccines
  • Problems with Today’s Vaccines
  • Vaccines and SIDS
  • “Vaccine-Preventable” Disease and Vaccine Information
  • Diphtheria
  • Tetanus
  • Pertussis (Whooping Cough)
  • Polio
  • Haemophilus Influenzae Type B
  • Pneumococcal
  • Hepatitis B
  • Rotavirus
  • Measles
  • Mumps
  • Rubella
  • Varicella (Chickenpox)
  • Influenza (flu shot) – work in progress
  • Vaccine Product Inserts
  • State Requirements and Exemptions
  • Dr. Andrew Wakefield
  • Websites
  • YouTube Videos
  • Facebook Pages to Follow
  • Articles

Continue reading Vaccines and “Vaccine-Preventable” Disease Research

Allegations of Scientific Misconduct by GACVS/WHO/CDC Representatives et al An open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan

http://thinktwice.com/Scientific_misconduct_by_WHO_and_CDC.pdf

Allegations of Scientific Misconduct by GACVS/WHO/CDC Representatives et al.
An open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan chanm@who.int

Cc: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, www-admin@nhlw.go.jp
Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, shiozaki@y-shiozaki.or.jp
Thomas Frieden, Director CDC, tomfrieden@cdc.gov
Vice-Chancellor, Professor Stuart McCutcheon, The University of Auckland, s.mccutcheon@auckland,ac.nz

From: Sin Hang Lee, MD shlee01@snet.net

Date: January 14, 2016

Dear Dr. Chan:

As a medical doctor and scientist, I write to present grave concerns regarding the conduct of certain members of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), the World Health Organization, the CDC and other scientific/health professionals during the time shortly before the public hearing on HPV Vaccine Safety which was held in Tokyo, Japan on February 26, 2014. I have come into possession of documentation which leads me to believe multiple individuals and organizations deliberately set out to mislead Japanese authorities regarding the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil® and Cervarix®, which were being promoted at that time.

I am sure you are well aware of the controversy currently surrounding these vaccines on a global level. I am also sure you are aware of the fact that public confidence in national and international health authorities is at an all time low throughout the world.

Should the information in this letter prove to be accurate, nothing short of an immediate independent investigation resulting in appropriate disciplinary actions for those involved will be able to restore the public trust. Therefore, I implore you to act quickly and decisively regarding this critical public health issue.
FOI Request and Significant Related Communications A series of emails recently uncovered via a Freedom of Information request submitted in New Zealand revealed evidence that Dr. Robert Pless, the chairperson of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), Dr. Nabae Koji of the Ministry of Health of Japan, Dr. Melinda Wharton of the CDC, Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris of Auckland University, New Zealand, and others (including WHO officials) may have been actively involved in a scheme to deliberately mislead the Japanese Expert Inquiry on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine safety before, during and after the February 26, 2014 public hearing in Tokyo. I believe the information supplied by this group led directly to the issuance of the GAVCS statement on the continued safety of HPV vaccination on March 12, 2014 which contains the following paragraph:

“Several papers have also been published pertaining to the finding of HPV L1 gene
DNA fragments in clinical specimens following HPV vaccination [13, 14]. These papers
claimed an association with clinical events of an inflammatory nature, including
cerebral vasculitis. While the GACVS has not formally reviewed this work, both the
finding of DNA fragments in the HPV vaccine and their postulated relationship to
clinical symptoms, have been reviewed by panels of experts. First, the presence of
HPV DNA fragments has been addressed by vaccine regulatory authorities who have
clearly outlined it as an expected finding given the manufacturing process, and not a
safety concern [15]. Second, the case reports [13] of adverse events hypothesized to
represent a causal association between the HPV L1 gene DNA fragments and death
were flawed in both clinical and laboratory methodology [16]. The paper described 2
fatal cases of sudden death in young women following HPV vaccine, one after 10 days
and one after 6 months, with no autopsy findings to support death as result of
cerebral vasculitis or an inflammatory syndrome. Thus the hypotheses raised in these
papers are not supported by what is understood about the residual DNA fragments
left over following vaccine production [17]: given the extremely small quantities of
residual HPV DNA in the vaccine, and no evidence of inflammation on autopsy,
ascribing a diagnosis of cerebral vasculitis and suggesting it may have caused death is
unfounded.” (the references 13-17 quoted were those listed in the GACVS Statement)

I believe this paragraph to be deceitful based on the following analysis:

The first sentence, “Several papers have also been published pertaining to the finding of HPV L1 gene DNA fragments in clinical specimens following HPV vaccination [13, 14]” was apparently constructed for dissembling and designed to mislead. The study in reference 13 Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Causal or Coincidental? Pharmaceut Reg
Affairs 2012, S12:001] was about HPV L1 VLPs. The authors of reference 13 never mentioned HPV L1 gene DNA fragments at all. Dr. Pless knew the difference between HPV L1 VLPs and HPV L1 gene DNA fragments because in his February 18, 2014 email addressed to Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris and the others involved in this scheme, Dr. Pless specifically asked Dr. Petousis-Harris to address her “statement regarding the alleged role of aluminum binding to DNA fragments and subsequent effects.” (see copy of February 18, 2014 email attached- It was not about HPV L1 VLPs).

One cannot help but conclude that Dr. Pless intentionally put these two unrelated articles together and claimed that both articles studied HPV L1 gene DNA fragments in order to mislead the non-scientific readers and vaccination policy makers.

Click link above for full article/letter.

Posting FOIA Documents on HPV Vaccine Cover Up by Officials

January 23, 2016, Posted by: , Leave a Comment

Post image for Posting FOIA Documents on HPV Vaccine Cover Up by OfficialsIn case you have not heard, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a scientist and doctor, has written an open-letter of complaint to Dr. Margret Chan, the Director-General of theWorld Health Organization (WHO) alleging misconduct and cover up of HPV vaccine dangers by global health officials. The source of information for Dr. Lee’s letter is a trail of emails and other communication between global health officials obtained via an Official Information Request in New Zealand.

The trail of communications provides evidence that global health officials knew that HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix cause a dangerous inflammatory response greater than other vaccines but reassured the public that the HPV vaccines were safe, aided by a seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor. Read our post on these revelations to get the full story.

Dr. Lee asked us to post the entire trail of communications on our website for the entire world to see and review.

Please spread the word and look for yourself to see what these officials charged with protecting the public health are really up to.

Official Information Request Document

Officials Cover Up Dangers of HPV Vaccines

January 23, 2016, Posted by: , Leave a Comment

Post image for Officials Cover Up Dangers of HPV VaccinesReports of official cover ups of vaccine dangers seem to be a recurring theme. Last year Dr.William Thompson a senior CDC scientist turned whistleblower revealed that he and other scientists and officials at CDC altered data in one of CDC’s studies to conceal the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. Then as detailed by Congressman Bill Posey in his official comments on the floor of the US House, this same group of scientists and officials met in a conference room and covered their tracks by destroying the documents.

Now comes news that health officials like Dr. Melinda Wharton of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as well as officials from Japan, other nations and the World Health Organization all participated in covering up the dangers of HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD, Director, Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, has submitted an official, open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. Margaret Chan, alleging gross misconduct, malfeasance and what potentially amounts to criminal behavior to mislead the global public regarding the safety of HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.

Dr. Lee’s lengthy letter detailing communications between global health officials documents that these officials knew that HPV vaccines cause an inflammatory reaction greater than other vaccines, yet reassured the public in official hearings and statements that the vaccines were safe, aided by a seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor.

Specifically, certain chemicals contained in the HPV vaccines have been demonstrated to trigger the release of cytokines or proteins called tumor necrosis factors (TNF) in the body. TNF cytokines can cause cell death. The release of TNF can also result in a wide range of reactions such as tumor regression, septic shock (serious whole-body inflammatory response that can result in dangerously low blood pressure and death), and cachexia (a wasting syndrome where the body loses weight, becomes fatigued, and muscles atrophy). Administration of TNF has been proven to cause death in humans and animals.

The chain of emails shows what appears to be attempts to conceal the truth, cover up the dangers, and generally mislead the public about what is and is not known about HPV vaccines and the dangers inherent to them.

The officials discuss how to respond to the safety concerns raised by legitimate scientific inquiry rather than how to ascertain the true extent of the dangers uncovered in the independent research.

Official statements appear to be a deliberate attempt to confuse the public into believing the safety concerns have been addressed in the peer-reviewed, published scientific literature when this is not the case. They imply that two different chemicals in the vaccines, HPV “virus like particles” and HPV DNA fragments are the same and that science has proven they are not dangerous but neither assertion is true. They are not the same and the only “science” is something ghost-written by CDC and a blogpost written by the aforementioned seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor. Proof of this claim does not exist in the published, peer-reviewed literature.

The open letter, alleging what amounts to crimes against humanity if they are proven true, is a wake-up call to officials around the world. An immediate investigation must commence, and all HPV vaccines should be withdrawn from the market immediately.

In addition, all vaccines should be subjected to further review, and a Congressional investigation of CDC Whistleblower William Thompson must commence.

You can read Dr. Lee’s open letter to the WHO Director-General here.

You can read the entire chain of communications obtained by an Official Information Request in New Zealand here: Official Information Request Document.

WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES

WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES

http://www.newswithviews.com/images/Jim_Howenstine_com_hdr.gif By Dr. James Howenstine, MD.
December 7, 2003
NewsWithViews.com

Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of health declared, “the only safe vaccine is one that is never used.”

Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox. At the time this vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in the number of cases of smallpox. Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872. In 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination program. A stringent compulsory smallpox vaccine program, which prosecuted those refusing the vaccine, was instituted in England in 1867. Within 4 years 97.5 % of persons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. The following year England experienced the worst smallpox epidemic[1] in its history with 44,840 deaths. Between 1871 and 1880 the incidence of smallpox escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000. The smallpox vaccine does not work.

Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been due to improvement in public health related to water quality and sanitation, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition, and higher standards of living. Typically the incidence of a disease was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. In England the incidence of polio had decreased by 82 % before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956.

In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated “Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated[2] person.”

There is a widely held belief that vaccines should not be criticized because the public might refuse to take them. This is valid only if the benefits exceed the known risks of the vaccines.

Do Vaccines Actually Prevent Disease?

Continue reading WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES