This is what it is really all about – The bottom line – The error was asking the state for a marriage license. – Please read entire document but begin on page 10 with Family Ties. http://www.teamlaw.net/Warn1.pdf – Now I don’t necessarily agree with every word printed here on this or other articles but for the most part, this does describe how we got to this point. Civics being removed from school curriculum hastening the reduction of knowledge of our rights as a people making it easier to mislead the populous. Just asking the govt. for a marriage license gives them the power to own your children. If you have to ask the govt. for a license to marry, you are considered to be incompetent to make any decisions of your own therefore incompetent to look after your children, in the eyes of the law. Very simple logic on their part that we must, as a people understand where they are coming from so we can do something about it. The lawyers helping fight this must come from this angle which is common law, not what they have been taught. Common law is the supreme law of the land and if presented properly always wins. The marriage contract the state told you was required is a tort of deceit in contract law and voids their misrepresented contract.
“Law of the Land”, “Due Course of Law” and “Due Process of Law” are synonymous. – People v. Skinner, Cal., 110 P.2d 41, 45; State v. Rossi, 71 R.I. 284, 43 A.2d 323, 326; Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v. City of Dayton, 138 Ohio St. 540, 38 N.E.2d 70, 72, 137 A.L.R.1058; Stoner v. Higginson, 316Pa.481, 175A. 527, 531
“All laws, rules and practices, which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void” – Marbury v. Madison, 5th U.S. (2 Cranch) 137, 180
“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law; but, is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment… In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed… Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it… A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution), it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law; and, no courts are bound to enforce it.” – Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
“…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.” – Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.
“Under our system of government, upon the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control him/her, except as [to] his/her conduct to[wards] others, leaving him/her the sole judge as to all that affects himself/herself.” – Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-60
“Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void.” – Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60
“The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.” – Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US22, at 24.
“A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.” – Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, at 113
HEP B FOR YOUR INFANT ! Rethink it ! Here is a fathers testimony about his now Dead baby!
Q. TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL BELKIN BEFORE THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES — CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (February 17, 1999) — Atlanta Georgia
My name is Michael Belkin. I am a father, businessman, former quantitative strategist at Salomon Brothers, and Director of the Hepatitis B Vaccine Project of the National Vaccine Information Center(NVIC).
The NVIC has studied Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act covering the last nine years on hepatitis B vaccine adverse events — and in 1996 there were more than three times as many reported serious adverse reactions as reported cases of the disease in the 0 to 14 age group. Of the total 2,424 adverse event reports made between 1990 and October 1998 in children under age 14 who only received hepatitis B vaccine, there were 1,209 serious events and 73 deaths. Thus, one half of the reports for children under age 14 who received only hepatitis B vaccine were for serious events that required an emergency room visit, hospitalization, or caused life-threatening health problems or permanent disabilities.
As a UC Berkeley graduate and advisor to some of the largest financial institutions in the world, I am qualified to analyze and make conclusions about statistics. Based on that experience, I am astonished that the scientists on this Committee would disregard or cover up data showing the number and severity of adverse reactions to this vaccine. Science is observing and learning from what is observed. The assertions of the CDC that the many reported adverse reactions to this vaccine do not exist or are a coincidence violates the basic principle of science, which is rooted in the observation and analysis of data.
A benefit/risk analysis of the hepatitis B vaccine for the average infant in America, not born to infected parents, must conclude that the VAERS data on adverse reactions shows the real-world risk of a newborn infant dying or being injured by the hepatitis B vaccine is a greater threat than the remote chance of contracting the primarily blood-transmitted disease.
My 5-week old daughter, Lyla Rose, died within 16 hours of her hepatitisB vaccination, which she received because of the universal vaccination policy this Committee instituted in 1991. At her death, Lyla had four of the eight highest-reported symptoms in the VAERS hepatitis B vaccine adverse reaction data. The NY Medical Examiner observed brain swelling at the autopsy but refused to record that or mention the hepatitis B vaccine Lyla received in the autopsy report.
I hold each one of you who participated in the promulgation or perpetuation of that mandated newborn vaccination policy personally responsible for my daughter’s death and the deaths and injuries of all the other beautiful, healthy infants who are victims of the hepatitis B vaccine. Your negligence is the proximate cause of my daughter’s death and you have failed to exercise reasonable care.
At the NVIC, we are overwhelmed following up constant new reports of deaths, seizures and autoimmune reactions following hepatitis B vaccination. Because the CDC refuses to acknowledge this large number of serious adverse reactions, hospitals and doctors who have been misled about the risks continue to administer the vaccine and then deny any vaccine connection when children die, get ill or have seizures within hours or days. CDC officials tell parents they have never heard of hepatitis B vaccine reactions.
That is a lie. For this government to continue to insist that hepatitis B vaccine adverse reaction reports do not exist is negligent, unethical — and is a crime against the children of America.
General Brief on Behalf of Informed Consent
Ralph Fucetola JD
Informed Consent is a Fundamental Human Right Protected Against Diminishment Through Legislative and Administrative Agency Denial of Philosophical or Religious Conscientious Objections to Mandated Vaccination. Informed Consent is Separate from Statutory Exemptions and May Not Be Abolished. The Right to Informed Consent is Meaningless Without the Right to Refuse Any Medical Intervention, Including Vaccination.
Informed Consent FAQs: http://drrimatruthreports.com/advance-vaccine-directive-card-faqs/
Law Note on Informed Consent and the Geneva Conventions:
In order to vindicate International Humanitarian Law regarding Informed Consent to any and all medical interventions, including vaccination, even during any declared local, national or international Health Emergency, the right to refuse any vaccination must be respected, whether that refusal is grounded in philosophical, medical, religious or no reasons at all.
Point One: The Legal Basis for Informed Consent Point
Point Two: Legitimate Government Regulation
Point Three: International Law Protects Informed Consent
Point Four: The Right Must Be Asserted to Be Protected
Point Five: The Right May Not Be Defeated by Unconstitutional Conditions
Senator.firstname.lastname@example.org, Continue reading EMAIL BLAST California senators and assembly members to STOP MANDATING VACCINES or they will be voted out of office.
REGARDING MILITARY EXEMPTIONS:
I have helped many military members, families and children in military schools and daycares legally avoid required immunizations. There are medical and administrative exemptions, and under administrative is a religious exemption. There are multi-branch regulations, and in some cases, additional branch-specific regulations. There are also federal statutes and federal Constitutional laws and protections that apply.
In fact, I have twice written to top Navy medical people in Washington, D.C. and gotten them to agree to revise unconstitutional Navy regulations concerning religious exemptions and exemption procedures, but the exemption rights were there before that (just unconstitutionally over-restrictive).
BUT, you have to know what you’re doing, how to approach it, so I do recommend that persons serious about an exemption in the military (and any situation where, regarding religious exemptions, you have to state your religious beliefs) get professional help. After helping 1,000’s of people better understand their rights, I have seen that most people’s common sense approach to stating their religious beliefs (when you have to do that–sometimes you do, sometimes you don’t; in the military, you do), is not fully consistent with the way the law works. What matters when you have to state your beliefs is that your stated beliefs meet the legal requirements, and not just what you may think is “religious” personally.
Alan Phillips, Vaccine Rights Attorney, the nation’s only attorney whose practice is focused on vaccine exemptions and vaccine legislative activism. http://www.vaccinerights.com/
Regarding Vaccines, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for Vaccine Damages, and HHS/FDA
Attorney Walter Kyle of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, began representing Plaintiffs with vaccine injuries ten years before the Vaccine Injury Act began, and has argued more than forty cases before the Special Masters of the United States Court of Federal Claims [under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act] – 42 U.S.C.A. §300aa, et.seq. As a result, Attorney Kyle has unique insight into the nuances of vaccine injury law.
To start our interview, may I ask how you became involved in vaccine law?
I began representation of vaccine-injured clients in Arkansas in 1977. My first case out of law school was representing a paraplegic mother who acquired paralytic polio from mutated Sabin live trivalent oral polio vaccine [TOPV] viruses shed from her three-month-old infant’s diapers. Centers for Disease control classified the woman in the “immune deficient” category of “vaccine associated contact cases” from Type 2 Sabin vaccine.
Walter, you just mentioned the phrase “vaccine viruses shed.” For those who are not familiar with such terminology I’d like to say it means certain types of vaccines contain certain viruses that are alive and once injected into [orally administered to] an individual can infect others via contact with bodily fluids, excrement, and sometimes coughing or sneezing. In your first vaccine case, the mother contracted paralytic polio from viruses “shed” in her infant’s diapers soiled with urine and feces.
Walter, how did you present that case at court?
In the first case against the manufacturer, American Cyanamid, which defended based on the fact that the woman was categorized as “immune deficient” and implied the reaction was her fault, I countered with the position that the Type 2 vaccine caused her immune deficiency since she had never been sick in her life before contact with that vaccine. After settling that lawsuit against the manufacturer for failure to warn, I instituted a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) lawsuit against HEW for regulatory violations in the license and release of OPV, in general, and the individual Lot of polio vaccine, in particular. In addition, I challenged the FDA’s intention to use Sabin’s live oral polio vaccine (OPV) for immunization of unwitting contacts of vaccine recipients as an unconstitutional invasion of their privacy (see Loge v. United States, 662 F.2d 1268 8th Cir. 1981), which evolved into civil actions of “battery” against the sole manufacturer of the Sabin vaccine –American Cyanamid.
Read the entire article here: http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/exposing-fdas-vaccine-injury-cover-up.html
The National Liberty Alliance (SPECIAL) – Justice for We The People
A LIVE teleconference with:
Roger Landry (TLB) – Host, Founder of The Liberty Beacon Project
Randy Maugans – Co-Host, Off Planet Media Owner/Dir., TLB IT Dir. & TLB Radio Network Dir.
John Durash – National Liberty Alliance Founder and Facilitator
Gerard – National Liberty Alliance Founder and Facilitator
The National Liberty Alliance: The difference between Common Law and the Law practiced in our courts today, called Statutory Law, is simply as follows: Common Law upholds the Constitution for the United States of America with its capstone Bill of Rights above all Statutory Law; Whereas Statutory Law is held above the Constitution for the United States of America and its capstone Bill of Rights, and therefore your rights are whatever our elected servants may choose it to be for you at the time. This is what NLA is endeavoring to change in our courts and thereby bring all our elected and appointed servants back under the chains of the Constitution because right now you are under the chains of your servants, this is the definition of tyranny.
Join Vaccine Rights Attorney Alan Phillips, J.D. as he discusses recent vaccine news including a New York legislator’s hands in the pharmaceutical money pot, flu shots for pregnant women, 13 cases of whooping cough in vaccinated students in NC, the significant increase in anti-vaxxers in France over a 5 year period, flu shots for dogs in Chicago, expert opinions about the true agenda of those at the top of WHO agencies and pharmaceutical companies, and more!
Find vaccine studies at vaccineresearchlibrary.com, and
sign up for the Vaccine Rights E-Newsletter at vaccinerights.com/newslettersignup.html, and
listen to ad-free archives at the new Vaccine Rights YouTube Channel.
The real question should be, which candidates own stock in any vaccine manufacturing companies?
As we enter 2016, and get geared up for political campaigns and primary voting, I’ve decided to put together a piece on the most currently popular candidates for presidency, specifically regarding their stances on vaccines.
Sure, it’s a topic not being brought up much in the debates, or in campaign ads.
Admittedly, it’s probably not the most important topic out there at the moment; unless of course you’re one of the rapidly growing minority of those who question vaccine safety, efficacy, and policy. In that case, you’re well aware of just how important this topic is, and how we are literally fighting tooth and nail and to retain our rights as parents to be able to choose whether or not to vaccinate our children.
If you’re not familiar with this topic, you can review some of my other blogs for my opinions/research on it, or you can do your own research, but I won’t get into it that much here. I will only say that I believe that we are witnessing history in regards to erosion of freedom, and it’s approaching a point where we won’t be able to deny the entry of toxic chemicals, carcinogens, and aborted fetal cells into our own bodies, all in the name of medical science. Despite mountains of evidence to prove that vaccines pose a serious risk to our health, and that diseases were not eliminated solely because of them, the U.S government, partnering with the giant drug companies that make them, and some of the more prestigious medical heads in the country, is leading a movement to eliminate personal choice, and to make vaccines mandatory. It has already happened in California, who joined Mississippi and West Virginia this year to be the first three states to eliminate religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions. If you choose to not vaccinate your children in CA, they now cannot attend school or daycare; you must homeschool. The CA bill SB-277’s success has prompted several other states to introduce similar bills that would strip parents of their rights to choose what is injected into their children. This is only the beginning, and it’s safe to say that President Obama’s support of these bills and his firm support of vaccine mandates have given the green light to states whose legislation is a majority of vaccine mandate advocates.
For this reason, I believe this next election is critical for the vaccine topic. It is certainly critical for hundreds of thousands of parents with already vaccine-injured children. In reality, it is much more critical than most people fathom; they just don’t know it yet. One thing I’ve learned since researching this topic in depth is that most “anti-vaxxers” didn’t start out anti-vaxxers. They vaccinated their children according to their doctor’s advice, compliant with the CDC schedule. At some point, it became obvious to them that their child had been damaged; in many cases, for life. One of the reasons that the “anti-vax movement” is gaining so much steam is because more and more children are being harmed, coinciding with more and more vaccines being added to the schedule. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that this trend will continue if people are actually forced to vaccinate on a fast growing schedule.
This topic is critical, and whoever our next president is, no matter their current views on vaccines, they will soon find out that they’ve got a difficult fight on their hands. Some of them already know this. Parents trying to protect their kids are fierce, like wolverines fighting off bears. Personally, I’m more than willing to take a bullet for my own kids if it meant saving their lives. Believe me, we have much more power on this issue than it feels like sometimes. We just need to channel our energy and focus on important aspects of this topic.I will offer a disclaimer before diving into the list. I’ll keep my political affiliation subdued, and will be as objective as I possibly can in reviewing these candidates. My cynical nature may or may not be on display at times, but I will try my hardest to be unbiased, I promise. 😉
This top 10 list is based on current projections and straw polls; I will update this article if anything changes going forward.I am neither republican nor democrat; I consider myself independent. I am honestly not a fan of our current political system, but I realize that we the people still do have a certain degree of power, and with that power comes the opportunity to cast your vote for who you want in office. We cannot and will not change anything by not voting, so I don’t agree with people who complain, and then don’t vote. Voting is crucial, especially if you support someone in particular. I only support one person in this whole list, and I may give myself away in the end… we’ll see.
I will not get into other political views; we are here to talk vaccines. Please keep the comments classy. 😉
1. JEB BUSH, REPUBLICAN
The brother of former president George W Bush, and son of former president George Herbert Walker Bush, Jeb is no stranger to the political limelight. As the governor of Florida from 1999-2007, he is familiar with how to present people with what he thinks they want to hear. Unfortunately for him, it seems not many people want another Bush in the White House, and it could be because of his way of addressing questions, such as the following: “What is your opinion on vaccines?”
His body language and demeanor in the following clip, in which he quickly answers the question and shuts down further discussion, doesn’t bode well for him among voters concerned about this issue, which is no doubt a larger body of civilians than he suspects. While it’s unclear if he supports mandatory vaccination, it is clear that he wouldn’t think long about it if presented with the decision in the future.
Stance: “Parents ought to make sure their children are vaccinated.”
Allegations of Scientific Misconduct by GACVS/WHO/CDC Representatives et al.
An open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan email@example.com
Cc: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, firstname.lastname@example.org
Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, email@example.com
Thomas Frieden, Director CDC, firstname.lastname@example.org
Vice-Chancellor, Professor Stuart McCutcheon, The University of Auckland, s.mccutcheon@auckland,ac.nz
From: Sin Hang Lee, MD email@example.com
Date: January 14, 2016
Dear Dr. Chan:
As a medical doctor and scientist, I write to present grave concerns regarding the conduct of certain members of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), the World Health Organization, the CDC and other scientific/health professionals during the time shortly before the public hearing on HPV Vaccine Safety which was held in Tokyo, Japan on February 26, 2014. I have come into possession of documentation which leads me to believe multiple individuals and organizations deliberately set out to mislead Japanese authorities regarding the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil® and Cervarix®, which were being promoted at that time.
I am sure you are well aware of the controversy currently surrounding these vaccines on a global level. I am also sure you are aware of the fact that public confidence in national and international health authorities is at an all time low throughout the world.
Should the information in this letter prove to be accurate, nothing short of an immediate independent investigation resulting in appropriate disciplinary actions for those involved will be able to restore the public trust. Therefore, I implore you to act quickly and decisively regarding this critical public health issue.
FOI Request and Significant Related Communications A series of emails recently uncovered via a Freedom of Information request submitted in New Zealand revealed evidence that Dr. Robert Pless, the chairperson of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), Dr. Nabae Koji of the Ministry of Health of Japan, Dr. Melinda Wharton of the CDC, Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris of Auckland University, New Zealand, and others (including WHO officials) may have been actively involved in a scheme to deliberately mislead the Japanese Expert Inquiry on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine safety before, during and after the February 26, 2014 public hearing in Tokyo. I believe the information supplied by this group led directly to the issuance of the GAVCS statement on the continued safety of HPV vaccination on March 12, 2014 which contains the following paragraph:
“Several papers have also been published pertaining to the finding of HPV L1 gene
DNA fragments in clinical specimens following HPV vaccination [13, 14]. These papers
claimed an association with clinical events of an inflammatory nature, including
cerebral vasculitis. While the GACVS has not formally reviewed this work, both the
finding of DNA fragments in the HPV vaccine and their postulated relationship to
clinical symptoms, have been reviewed by panels of experts. First, the presence of
HPV DNA fragments has been addressed by vaccine regulatory authorities who have
clearly outlined it as an expected finding given the manufacturing process, and not a
safety concern . Second, the case reports  of adverse events hypothesized to
represent a causal association between the HPV L1 gene DNA fragments and death
were flawed in both clinical and laboratory methodology . The paper described 2
fatal cases of sudden death in young women following HPV vaccine, one after 10 days
and one after 6 months, with no autopsy findings to support death as result of
cerebral vasculitis or an inflammatory syndrome. Thus the hypotheses raised in these
papers are not supported by what is understood about the residual DNA fragments
left over following vaccine production : given the extremely small quantities of
residual HPV DNA in the vaccine, and no evidence of inflammation on autopsy,
ascribing a diagnosis of cerebral vasculitis and suggesting it may have caused death is
unfounded.” (the references 13-17 quoted were those listed in the GACVS Statement)
I believe this paragraph to be deceitful based on the following analysis:
The first sentence, “Several papers have also been published pertaining to the finding of HPV L1 gene DNA fragments in clinical specimens following HPV vaccination [13, 14]” was apparently constructed for dissembling and designed to mislead. The study in reference 13 Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Causal or Coincidental? Pharmaceut Reg
Affairs 2012, S12:001] was about HPV L1 VLPs. The authors of reference 13 never mentioned HPV L1 gene DNA fragments at all. Dr. Pless knew the difference between HPV L1 VLPs and HPV L1 gene DNA fragments because in his February 18, 2014 email addressed to Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris and the others involved in this scheme, Dr. Pless specifically asked Dr. Petousis-Harris to address her “statement regarding the alleged role of aluminum binding to DNA fragments and subsequent effects.” (see copy of February 18, 2014 email attached- It was not about HPV L1 VLPs).
One cannot help but conclude that Dr. Pless intentionally put these two unrelated articles together and claimed that both articles studied HPV L1 gene DNA fragments in order to mislead the non-scientific readers and vaccination policy makers.
Click link above for full article/letter.
Posting FOIA Documents on HPV Vaccine Cover Up by Officials
In case you have not heard, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a scientist and doctor, has written an open-letter of complaint to Dr. Margret Chan, the Director-General of theWorld Health Organization (WHO) alleging misconduct and cover up of HPV vaccine dangers by global health officials. The source of information for Dr. Lee’s letter is a trail of emails and other communication between global health officials obtained via an Official Information Request in New Zealand.
The trail of communications provides evidence that global health officials knew that HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix cause a dangerous inflammatory response greater than other vaccines but reassured the public that the HPV vaccines were safe, aided by a seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor. Read our post on these revelations to get the full story.
Dr. Lee asked us to post the entire trail of communications on our website for the entire world to see and review.
Please spread the word and look for yourself to see what these officials charged with protecting the public health are really up to.
Officials Cover Up Dangers of HPV Vaccines
Reports of official cover ups of vaccine dangers seem to be a recurring theme. Last year Dr.William Thompson a senior CDC scientist turned whistleblower revealed that he and other scientists and officials at CDC altered data in one of CDC’s studies to conceal the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. Then as detailed by Congressman Bill Posey in his official comments on the floor of the US House, this same group of scientists and officials met in a conference room and covered their tracks by destroying the documents.
Now comes news that health officials like Dr. Melinda Wharton of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as well as officials from Japan, other nations and the World Health Organization all participated in covering up the dangers of HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD, Director, Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, has submitted an official, open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. Margaret Chan, alleging gross misconduct, malfeasance and what potentially amounts to criminal behavior to mislead the global public regarding the safety of HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.
Dr. Lee’s lengthy letter detailing communications between global health officials documents that these officials knew that HPV vaccines cause an inflammatory reaction greater than other vaccines, yet reassured the public in official hearings and statements that the vaccines were safe, aided by a seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor.
Specifically, certain chemicals contained in the HPV vaccines have been demonstrated to trigger the release of cytokines or proteins called tumor necrosis factors (TNF) in the body. TNF cytokines can cause cell death. The release of TNF can also result in a wide range of reactions such as tumor regression, septic shock (serious whole-body inflammatory response that can result in dangerously low blood pressure and death), and cachexia (a wasting syndrome where the body loses weight, becomes fatigued, and muscles atrophy). Administration of TNF has been proven to cause death in humans and animals.
The chain of emails shows what appears to be attempts to conceal the truth, cover up the dangers, and generally mislead the public about what is and is not known about HPV vaccines and the dangers inherent to them.
The officials discuss how to respond to the safety concerns raised by legitimate scientific inquiry rather than how to ascertain the true extent of the dangers uncovered in the independent research.
Official statements appear to be a deliberate attempt to confuse the public into believing the safety concerns have been addressed in the peer-reviewed, published scientific literature when this is not the case. They imply that two different chemicals in the vaccines, HPV “virus like particles” and HPV DNA fragments are the same and that science has proven they are not dangerous but neither assertion is true. They are not the same and the only “science” is something ghost-written by CDC and a blogpost written by the aforementioned seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor. Proof of this claim does not exist in the published, peer-reviewed literature.
The open letter, alleging what amounts to crimes against humanity if they are proven true, is a wake-up call to officials around the world. An immediate investigation must commence, and all HPV vaccines should be withdrawn from the market immediately.
In addition, all vaccines should be subjected to further review, and a Congressional investigation of CDC Whistleblower William Thompson must commence.
You can read Dr. Lee’s open letter to the WHO Director-General here.
You can read the entire chain of communications obtained by an Official Information Request in New Zealand here: Official Information Request Document.
The UCC Connection (Uniform Commercial Code at UCC 1-207) – How to Free Yourself From Legal Tyranny – Howard Freeman
Published by ruralkiller
By reading this you will get a little better understand of the UCC. Read it and impower yourself to a certain degree cause this document is only a a drop of water into a very big bucket !!
Published by: ruralkiller on Dec 29, 2012
Copyright: Attribution Non-commercial
This article has really filled in my “voids” that kept me from fully understanding things. I have found it to be one of the best discussions on the subject of freedom, and how our own Government has managed to take that freedom from us, all the while giving lip service to the Constitution. The title of the article is The UCC Connection. The author is noted as Howard Freeman. It is distributed by Americans for Constitutional Government, PO BOX 99, Lancaster, Ohio 43130. It also notes “without prejudice U.C.C. 1-207. And it is dated September 22nd 1991.(I do not know if reserving rights under U.C.C. 1-207 is a method of asserting “copyrights.” It is possible that the author did not want to use the conventional (c) as it might imply an implied contract with the US Patent Office, and thus the Federal Government. If this is the case, I apologize to Mr. Freeman, as I do not wish to infringe upon his rights.) Sincerely, Eric Gray sysop – The Desert Reef BBS firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com THE UCC CONNECTION – How To Free Yourself From Legal Tyranny by Howard Freeman (Originally published by the Oklahoma Freedom Council)
This vaccine has only been on my peripheral
radar because they aren’t trying to shoot up
my infant with it (yet). But, I do have friends
and family with young daughters approaching
the age where their doctor may insist they
need this poison.