General Brief on Behalf of Informed Consent – Ralph Fucetola JD

General Brief on Behalf of Informed Consent
Ralph Fucetola JD

INTRODUCTION
Informed Consent is a Fundamental Human Right Protected Against Diminishment Through Legislative and Administrative Agency Denial of Philosophical or Religious Conscientious Objections to Mandated Vaccination. Informed Consent is Separate from Statutory Exemptions and May Not Be Abolished. The Right to Informed Consent is Meaningless Without the Right to Refuse Any Medical Intervention, Including Vaccination.

Informed Consent FAQs: http://drrimatruthreports.com/advance-vaccine-directive-card-faqs/
Law Note on Informed Consent and the Geneva Conventions:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/the-sources-of-the-law-the-right-of-informed-consent/

In order to vindicate International Humanitarian Law regarding Informed Consent to any and all medical interventions, including vaccination, even during any declared local, national or international Health Emergency, the right to refuse any vaccination must be respected, whether that refusal is grounded in philosophical, medical, religious or no reasons at all.

Introduction

Point One: The Legal Basis for Informed Consent Point

Point Two: Legitimate Government Regulation

Point Three: International Law Protects Informed Consent

Point Four: The Right Must Be Asserted to Be Protected

Point Five: The Right May Not Be Defeated by Unconstitutional Conditions

Continue reading General Brief on Behalf of Informed Consent – Ralph Fucetola JD

Lawyers who may HELP you avoid vaccinations or provide legal representation for vaccine injury

********************************************

healthcare workersREGARDING MILITARY EXEMPTIONS:

I have helped many military members, families and children in military schools and daycares legally avoid required immunizations. There are medical and administrative exemptions, and under administrative is a religious exemption. There are multi-branch regulations, and in some cases, additional branch-specific regulations. There are also federal statutes and federal Constitutional laws and protections that apply.

In fact, I have twice written to top Navy medical people in Washington, D.C. and gotten them to agree to revise unconstitutional Navy regulations concerning religious exemptions and exemption procedures, but the exemption rights were there before that (just unconstitutionally over-restrictive).

BUT, you have to know what you’re doing, how to approach it, so I do recommend that persons serious about an exemption in the military (and any situation where, regarding religious exemptions, you have to state your religious beliefs) get professional help. After helping 1,000’s of people better understand their rights, I have seen that most people’s common sense approach to stating their religious beliefs (when you have to do that–sometimes you do, sometimes you don’t; in the military, you do), is not fully consistent with the way the law works. What matters when you have to state your beliefs is that your stated beliefs meet the legal requirements, and not just what you may think is “religious” personally.

Alan Phillips, Vaccine Rights Attorney, the nation’s only attorney whose practice is focused on vaccine exemptions and vaccine legislative activism. http://www.vaccinerights.com/

********************************************

Regarding Vaccines, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for Vaccine Damages, and HHS/FDA

Attorney Walter Kyle of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, began representing Plaintiffs with vaccine injuries ten years before the Vaccine Injury Act began, and has argued more than forty cases before the Special Masters of the United States Court of Federal Claims [under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act] – 42 U.S.C.A. §300aa, et.seq. As a result, Attorney Kyle has unique insight into the nuances of vaccine injury law.

To start our interview, may I ask how you became involved in vaccine law?

I began representation of vaccine-injured clients in Arkansas in 1977. My first case out of law school was representing a paraplegic mother who acquired paralytic polio from mutated Sabin live trivalent oral polio vaccine [TOPV] viruses shed from her three-month-old infant’s diapers. Centers for Disease control classified the woman in the “immune deficient” category of “vaccine associated contact cases” from Type 2 Sabin vaccine.

Walter, you just mentioned the phrase “vaccine viruses shed.” For those who are not familiar with such terminology I’d like to say it means certain types of vaccines contain certain viruses that are alive and once injected into [orally administered to] an individual can infect others via contact with bodily fluids, excrement, and sometimes coughing or sneezing. In your first vaccine case, the mother contracted paralytic polio from viruses “shed” in her infant’s diapers soiled with urine and feces.

Walter, how did you present that case at court?

In the first case against the manufacturer, American Cyanamid, which defended based on the fact that the woman was categorized as “immune deficient” and implied the reaction was her fault, I countered with the position that the Type 2 vaccine caused her immune deficiency since she had never been sick in her life before contact with that vaccine. After settling that lawsuit against the manufacturer for failure to warn, I instituted a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) lawsuit against HEW for regulatory violations in the license and release of OPV, in general, and the individual Lot of polio vaccine, in particular. In addition, I challenged the FDA’s intention to use Sabin’s live oral polio vaccine (OPV) for immunization of unwitting contacts of vaccine recipients as an unconstitutional invasion of their privacy (see Loge v. United States, 662 F.2d 1268 8th Cir. 1981), which evolved into civil actions of “battery” against the sole manufacturer of the Sabin vaccine –American Cyanamid.

Read the entire article here: http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/exposing-fdas-vaccine-injury-cover-up.html

***************************************************

Vaccines – news from NY, NC, IL, France, flu shots for dogs…

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thevaccineagenda/2016/01/05/vaccines-news-from-ny-nc-il-france-flu-shots-for-dogs

Join Vaccine Rights Attorney Alan Phillips, J.D. as he discusses recent vaccine news including a New York legislator’s hands in the pharmaceutical money pot, flu shots for pregnant women, 13 cases of whooping cough in vaccinated students in NC, the significant increase in anti-vaxxers in France over a 5 year period, flu shots for dogs in Chicago, expert opinions about the true agenda of those at the top of WHO agencies and pharmaceutical companies, and more!

Email Attorney Phillips at attorney@vaccinerights.com during the week and listen to your answer live on the air or in the archives.

Find vaccine studies at vaccineresearchlibrary.com, and

sign up for the Vaccine Rights E-Newsletter at vaccinerights.com/newslettersignup.html, and

listen to ad-free archives at the new Vaccine Rights YouTube Channel.

Woman Contracts Polio Virus ‘from Vaccinated Infant’

Woman Contracts Polio Virus ‘from Vaccinated Infant’

Makers blame it on weak immunity

 In 1977, one of attorney Walter Kyle’s first ever vaccine injury cases involved a mother who acquired paralytic polio from mutated Sabin live trivalent oral polio vaccine [TOPV] viruses shed from her three-month-old infant’s diapers. This case isn’t new by any means, but it shows just how damaging vaccines can be, and why the US is trying to overturn citizen’s rights to sue pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injury.

Continue reading Woman Contracts Polio Virus ‘from Vaccinated Infant’

The real disease – the spread of unchecked executive power.

Vaccine flu vax shut down NY

Please consider donating to help defer costs…. Attorney Aaron Siri took on this case pro-bono.

To quote Aaron Siri, Esq, attorney for the Plaintiffs-Petitioners, “The real disease here to be concerned about is the spread of unchecked executive power and the illiberalism that such excesses has wrought on mankind through history.”
“This is a welcome judicial affirmation of the importance of a genuine political process to determine the extent to which the state should be involved in personal health decisions,” said Robert J. Krakow, Esq. Continue reading The real disease – the spread of unchecked executive power.

Letter to Federal Agents from Alaskan Supreme Court Judge Anna Maria Riezinger (Anna Von Reitz)

dated: Nov 28 2015

http://annavonreitz.com/dearfederalagents.pdf

Anna Maria Riezinger (Anna Von Reitz)
November 28, 2015
Big Lake, Alaska
Dear Federal Agents:
I am addressing this letter in this way, because it is my understanding that it will be read by members of both the FBI and the US Marshals Service. It is also my understanding that you have available for examination a wet-ink signed copy of the illustrated affidavit of probable cause entitled “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” as back-up reference and evidence. Continue reading Letter to Federal Agents from Alaskan Supreme Court Judge Anna Maria Riezinger (Anna Von Reitz)