General Brief on Behalf of Informed Consent
Ralph Fucetola JD
Informed Consent is a Fundamental Human Right Protected Against Diminishment Through Legislative and Administrative Agency Denial of Philosophical or Religious Conscientious Objections to Mandated Vaccination. Informed Consent is Separate from Statutory Exemptions and May Not Be Abolished. The Right to Informed Consent is Meaningless Without the Right to Refuse Any Medical Intervention, Including Vaccination.
Informed Consent FAQs: http://drrimatruthreports.com/advance-vaccine-directive-card-faqs/
Law Note on Informed Consent and the Geneva Conventions:
In order to vindicate International Humanitarian Law regarding Informed Consent to any and all medical interventions, including vaccination, even during any declared local, national or international Health Emergency, the right to refuse any vaccination must be respected, whether that refusal is grounded in philosophical, medical, religious or no reasons at all.
Point One: The Legal Basis for Informed Consent Point
Point Two: Legitimate Government Regulation
Point Three: International Law Protects Informed Consent
Point Four: The Right Must Be Asserted to Be Protected
Point Five: The Right May Not Be Defeated by Unconstitutional Conditions
Do you feel like you have no choice in the matter of vaccination or other medical decisions for your children or yourself? STOP!
You make your own decisions. No one makes them for you. You have a right to refuse any medical procedure.
As the primary care provider for your children, you have the right to act on their behalf. Know your rights, and proclaim it.
“The Advance Vaccine Directive is a valid Advance Health Directive or Living Will binding on the medical community under the law of Informed Consent. The Wallet Card our legal team developed is based on the latest US Supreme Court “I Do Not Consent” case, Missouri vs McNeely (2013). It covers circumstances in which you may find yourself facing not-consented vaccination, such as being brought into an ER and being subjected to immediate vaccination.” Ralph Fucetola JD
Summary of Legal Justification for the AVD Card: Even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish the… privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing the… skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (Missouri v. McNeely, US Supreme Court, 2013
Read the brief on informed consent. Forced vaccination is against the Nuremberg Code on Medical Ethics and the Geneva Convention.
You can carry an AVD card with you at all times, the same as anyone who carries a medical information bracelet. Dr. Rima Laibow’s website:
US Supreme Court Says:
Your Right to Refuse Only Exists IF You Assert It!
Assert Your Right to Refuse ALL Vaccines With ADVANCE VACCINE DIRECTIVE Card.
CARRY IT AT ALL TIMES!
IMPORTANT NOTE: Each Member of Your Family Must Carry His/Her Own Signed Card
Order your card here – http://drrimatruthreports.com/advance-vaccine-directive-card-faqs/
Also, have these on hand to pass out to anyone requesting you vaccinate – http://vaccinecommonsense.com/2015/12/13/physicians-warranty-of-vaccine-safety-form/
[Question] Who should be informed that an Advance Vaccine Directive has been created?
*Once the Advance Vaccine Directive card has been signed and dated (or signed for another person and dated), potential vaccinators should be notified and a copy of the front and back should be placed in the medical or other records of the signer.
*We recommend providing your primary care physician, your child’s pediatrician, any specialists with whom you are in treatment, the health officer at your place of employment and other health personnel with a copy of the front and back of the card and a letter requesting that the copy be placed in the permanent medical record of the signer.
*The card should be presented, but NOT surrendered, if hospital, urgent or other emergency care is needed.
*We recommend carrying a copy of the card with you as well as the original so that you can provide that copy without losing control of, and therefore proof of, the card itself.
*At a hospital the card can be exhibited with a request for a notation on the patient’s Chart.
*[Question] Does a Vaccine Advance Directive protect your vaccination rights when you may not be able to decide for yourself?
*Local governmental units such as counties, school boards, States and even nations may pass laws mandating vaccinations. These are superseded by treaty law, which overrides local and national laws. For example,the 126 countries which have ratified the Geneva Conventions.
The relationship between various international conventions and Informed Consent is discussed here: Law Note on Informed Consent and the Geneva Conventions: http://drrimatruthreports.com/the-sources-of-the-law-the-right-of-informed-consent/
The Sources of the Law: the Right of Informed Consent
Share this Law Note with this link: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=27017
The California legislature is considering a bill, AB2638, that would protect physicians’ rights to write medical exemptions to vaccination without fear of discipline or liability.
Since the passing of SB277, which eliminated all non-medical exemptions to vaccination, many doctors are refusing to write medical exemptions to anyone for any reason. This is because California law currently provides physicians freedom from liability for administering vaccinations, but not from writing medical exemptions.
In this environment, where physicians are denying medical exemptions to patients with qualifying medical circumstances due to fear of retaliation, the health of our most vulnerable patients is at risk.
Write to your representatives in the Assembly and urge them to support AB 2638!
I feel like I am writing to old friends, because together we worked on getting Personal Belief Exemptions late in 2015, just as the option to get PBEs was about to expire. Thank you for reading my e-book (3 Things Every California Parent Needs to Know about the New Vaccine Mandate Law)!
I wanted you to be the first to know about my two online webinar on medical exemptions, one free to get you started, and a paid webinar with an early bird special ($27).
You and I share a conviction that parents are eager to be educated, and are seeking a voice in their children’s vaccination protocol.
As you know, new PBEs are no longer available. Now SB277 allows only medical exemptions, given by a licensed MD / DO, to change a vaccination schedule in California, or else a child may not attend school in the state.
This is a high bar to cross! Parents have struggled mightily, been afraid for their children, and wondered what is the right thing to do.
Would you like to know how to request a medical exemption from your doctor?
Have you heard they are impossible to get?
Are you surrounded with people emphasizing a belief that only vaccines protect us from disease?
Learn the truth about these and other common and confusing statements around vaccines and the new vaccine mandate law.
I am so happy to share with you my NEW FREE 30-minute WEBINAR: 3 Vaccine Mandate Myths
You are my travel companions, and we are revisiting a subject we care about. I welcome you to join me once more, taking another step in learning.
My free webinar has a wonderful BONUS from the new important medical book Vaccines & Autoimmunity. Don’t miss this opportunity!
Then, as you follow the information stream which I offer you, you will be led to my 90-minute webinar that takes you through the steps to educate you deeply in the vaccine science that supports having caution in administering vaccines in a one-size-fits-all program for all children. And right now, I have an EARLY BIRD SPECIAL for the long program!
Both the free 30-minute webinar and the paid 90-minute webinar are packed with helpful information. They work together, so don’t miss either one!
Here’s the link to get started >>https://www.raphaelmedicine.com/3vaccinemyths-em
and the link for the paid webinar – https://www.raphaelmedicine.com/corneredtoconfident
You may see my ads online for this program. Please tell your family and friends.
It’s nice to be working together again!
To healthy children and a healthy future,
Dr. Kelly Sutton MD
P.S. If you know now you want an appointment with me to request a medical exemption to change your child’s vaccination schedule, please email my office manager, Denise, to get the process started and save time: email@example.com.
Watch the webinars too, to deepen your knowledge of the choices to make.
2nd source for Medical Exemptions
Allison Folmar Esq. – Parental Rights Attorney.
REGARDING MILITARY EXEMPTIONS:
I have helped many military members, families and children in military schools and daycares legally avoid required immunizations. There are medical and administrative exemptions, and under administrative is a religious exemption. There are multi-branch regulations, and in some cases, additional branch-specific regulations. There are also federal statutes and federal Constitutional laws and protections that apply.
In fact, I have twice written to top Navy medical people in Washington, D.C. and gotten them to agree to revise unconstitutional Navy regulations concerning religious exemptions and exemption procedures, but the exemption rights were there before that (just unconstitutionally over-restrictive).
BUT, you have to know what you’re doing, how to approach it, so I do recommend that persons serious about an exemption in the military (and any situation where, regarding religious exemptions, you have to state your religious beliefs) get professional help. After helping 1,000’s of people better understand their rights, I have seen that most people’s common sense approach to stating their religious beliefs (when you have to do that–sometimes you do, sometimes you don’t; in the military, you do), is not fully consistent with the way the law works. What matters when you have to state your beliefs is that your stated beliefs meet the legal requirements, and not just what you may think is “religious” personally.
Alan Phillips, Vaccine Rights Attorney, the nation’s only attorney whose practice is focused on vaccine exemptions and vaccine legislative activism. http://www.vaccinerights.com/
Regarding Vaccines, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for Vaccine Damages, and HHS/FDA
Attorney Walter Kyle of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, began representing Plaintiffs with vaccine injuries ten years before the Vaccine Injury Act began, and has argued more than forty cases before the Special Masters of the United States Court of Federal Claims [under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act] – 42 U.S.C.A. §300aa, et.seq. As a result, Attorney Kyle has unique insight into the nuances of vaccine injury law.
To start our interview, may I ask how you became involved in vaccine law?
I began representation of vaccine-injured clients in Arkansas in 1977. My first case out of law school was representing a paraplegic mother who acquired paralytic polio from mutated Sabin live trivalent oral polio vaccine [TOPV] viruses shed from her three-month-old infant’s diapers. Centers for Disease control classified the woman in the “immune deficient” category of “vaccine associated contact cases” from Type 2 Sabin vaccine.
Walter, you just mentioned the phrase “vaccine viruses shed.” For those who are not familiar with such terminology I’d like to say it means certain types of vaccines contain certain viruses that are alive and once injected into [orally administered to] an individual can infect others via contact with bodily fluids, excrement, and sometimes coughing or sneezing. In your first vaccine case, the mother contracted paralytic polio from viruses “shed” in her infant’s diapers soiled with urine and feces.
Walter, how did you present that case at court?
In the first case against the manufacturer, American Cyanamid, which defended based on the fact that the woman was categorized as “immune deficient” and implied the reaction was her fault, I countered with the position that the Type 2 vaccine caused her immune deficiency since she had never been sick in her life before contact with that vaccine. After settling that lawsuit against the manufacturer for failure to warn, I instituted a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) lawsuit against HEW for regulatory violations in the license and release of OPV, in general, and the individual Lot of polio vaccine, in particular. In addition, I challenged the FDA’s intention to use Sabin’s live oral polio vaccine (OPV) for immunization of unwitting contacts of vaccine recipients as an unconstitutional invasion of their privacy (see Loge v. United States, 662 F.2d 1268 8th Cir. 1981), which evolved into civil actions of “battery” against the sole manufacturer of the Sabin vaccine –American Cyanamid.
Read the entire article here: http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/exposing-fdas-vaccine-injury-cover-up.html
Dr. Michael Mclean, former President of the International Chiropractors Association, co-founder of the Virginia Society of Chiropractic and Chiropractor of the Year. We discuss the multitude of Bills being introduced across the US to remove philosophical and religious exemptions to vaccinations. We also talk about the dangers associated with vaccinations, the vaccine court which is limiting compensation to families with vaccine injured children, and the toxic ingredients in each vaccine.
He recommends everyone contact Congressman Jason Chaffetz and ask him to subpoena Dr. William Thompsen, CDC whistleblower at www.chaffetzhouse.gov so that the truth about the CDC study of the MMR vaccine and it’s association with the MMR vaccine can come out.
A law school professor and former criminal defense attorney tells you why you should never agree to be interviewed by the police.
Our government tells us babies need vaccines to be safe and healthy. The reality is that there is a level of risk in giving vaccines and the CDC is fully aware of the risk. Many parents accept what they are told. Others question. Some families have differing opinions on the need for vaccines with one spouse in favor, and the other opposed.
If you are considering giving your child a vaccine for any reason, please do a few things first:
My son and I share a doctor who recently declined to treat my son, and said she would need to bill me directly for past services, because we each refused to sign the form acknowledging her office’s HIPAA policy. Doc said that by not signing the acknowledgement form Jorge Ivan and I made it impossible for her office to bill our insurance provider. I said, “I’ve been told that you need to ask for my signature on this form, but that I am not obliged to sign it.” Eventually, Doc and I agreed that I would do some research to prove my case, and if I couldn’t prove it – and still refused to sign the form – that I would agree to pay for her services directly.
Today I had a bit of time and did that research. I learned that I’m totally within my rights not to sign and that actually, my doctor’s conformance with law could be improved in several ways:
Published by ruralkiller
By reading this you will get a little better understand of the UCC. Read it and impower yourself to a certain degree cause this document is only a a drop of water into a very big bucket !!
Published by: ruralkiller on Dec 29, 2012
Copyright: Attribution Non-commercial
This article has really filled in my “voids” that kept me from fully understanding things. I have found it to be one of the best discussions on the subject of freedom, and how our own Government has managed to take that freedom from us, all the while giving lip service to the Constitution. The title of the article is The UCC Connection. The author is noted as Howard Freeman. It is distributed by Americans for Constitutional Government, PO BOX 99, Lancaster, Ohio 43130. It also notes “without prejudice U.C.C. 1-207. And it is dated September 22nd 1991.(I do not know if reserving rights under U.C.C. 1-207 is a method of asserting “copyrights.” It is possible that the author did not want to use the conventional (c) as it might imply an implied contract with the US Patent Office, and thus the Federal Government. If this is the case, I apologize to Mr. Freeman, as I do not wish to infringe upon his rights.) Sincerely, Eric Gray sysop – The Desert Reef BBS firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com THE UCC CONNECTION – How To Free Yourself From Legal Tyranny by Howard Freeman (Originally published by the Oklahoma Freedom Council)