Learn about exemptions here:
For CA Parents, get a medical exemption evaluation:
Learn about exemptions here:
For CA Parents, get a medical exemption evaluation:
in AUSTRALIA, they are prepared to treat people who they have poisoned with vaccines. Why would any parent want this kind of “treatment” for their child (granted, this is the flu vaccine, but still!)?!!! Full document right here: www.health.nsw.gov.au/
FLU SHOTS. FLU SHOTS. 18% EFFECTIVE and linked to Guillain-Barre and alzheimer’s, among other things.
The founder of the CDC, Dr. Alexander Langmuir, later Emeritus Professor at Harvard, was adamant when he stated:
“I would not take the flu vaccine, my wife doesn’t take the flu vaccine, no one should take the flu vaccine. And in fact, when I was head of the CDC, I wanted to make that as a public statement, and I refused to say that you should take the flu vaccine.” One reason being the flu vaccine is especially problematic in being recommended or required annually, and some brands still contain Thimerosal. That’s why I’m now a professor at Harvard.”
“There is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza. The producers of these vaccines know that they are worthless, but they go on selling them, anyway.”
— J. Anthony Morris, PhD, former chief vaccine control officer and research virologist at the US Food and Drug Administration Continue reading Why doctors say ‘No’ to flu shots…..?
Included in this document:
Allegations of Scientific Misconduct by GACVS/WHO/CDC Representatives et al.
An open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan email@example.com
Cc: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, firstname.lastname@example.org
Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, email@example.com
Thomas Frieden, Director CDC, firstname.lastname@example.org
Vice-Chancellor, Professor Stuart McCutcheon, The University of Auckland, s.mccutcheon@auckland,ac.nz
From: Sin Hang Lee, MD email@example.com
Date: January 14, 2016
Dear Dr. Chan:
As a medical doctor and scientist, I write to present grave concerns regarding the conduct of certain members of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), the World Health Organization, the CDC and other scientific/health professionals during the time shortly before the public hearing on HPV Vaccine Safety which was held in Tokyo, Japan on February 26, 2014. I have come into possession of documentation which leads me to believe multiple individuals and organizations deliberately set out to mislead Japanese authorities regarding the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil® and Cervarix®, which were being promoted at that time.
I am sure you are well aware of the controversy currently surrounding these vaccines on a global level. I am also sure you are aware of the fact that public confidence in national and international health authorities is at an all time low throughout the world.
Should the information in this letter prove to be accurate, nothing short of an immediate independent investigation resulting in appropriate disciplinary actions for those involved will be able to restore the public trust. Therefore, I implore you to act quickly and decisively regarding this critical public health issue.
FOI Request and Significant Related Communications A series of emails recently uncovered via a Freedom of Information request submitted in New Zealand revealed evidence that Dr. Robert Pless, the chairperson of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), Dr. Nabae Koji of the Ministry of Health of Japan, Dr. Melinda Wharton of the CDC, Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris of Auckland University, New Zealand, and others (including WHO officials) may have been actively involved in a scheme to deliberately mislead the Japanese Expert Inquiry on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine safety before, during and after the February 26, 2014 public hearing in Tokyo. I believe the information supplied by this group led directly to the issuance of the GAVCS statement on the continued safety of HPV vaccination on March 12, 2014 which contains the following paragraph:
“Several papers have also been published pertaining to the finding of HPV L1 gene
DNA fragments in clinical specimens following HPV vaccination [13, 14]. These papers
claimed an association with clinical events of an inflammatory nature, including
cerebral vasculitis. While the GACVS has not formally reviewed this work, both the
finding of DNA fragments in the HPV vaccine and their postulated relationship to
clinical symptoms, have been reviewed by panels of experts. First, the presence of
HPV DNA fragments has been addressed by vaccine regulatory authorities who have
clearly outlined it as an expected finding given the manufacturing process, and not a
safety concern . Second, the case reports  of adverse events hypothesized to
represent a causal association between the HPV L1 gene DNA fragments and death
were flawed in both clinical and laboratory methodology . The paper described 2
fatal cases of sudden death in young women following HPV vaccine, one after 10 days
and one after 6 months, with no autopsy findings to support death as result of
cerebral vasculitis or an inflammatory syndrome. Thus the hypotheses raised in these
papers are not supported by what is understood about the residual DNA fragments
left over following vaccine production : given the extremely small quantities of
residual HPV DNA in the vaccine, and no evidence of inflammation on autopsy,
ascribing a diagnosis of cerebral vasculitis and suggesting it may have caused death is
unfounded.” (the references 13-17 quoted were those listed in the GACVS Statement)
I believe this paragraph to be deceitful based on the following analysis:
The first sentence, “Several papers have also been published pertaining to the finding of HPV L1 gene DNA fragments in clinical specimens following HPV vaccination [13, 14]” was apparently constructed for dissembling and designed to mislead. The study in reference 13 Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Causal or Coincidental? Pharmaceut Reg
Affairs 2012, S12:001] was about HPV L1 VLPs. The authors of reference 13 never mentioned HPV L1 gene DNA fragments at all. Dr. Pless knew the difference between HPV L1 VLPs and HPV L1 gene DNA fragments because in his February 18, 2014 email addressed to Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris and the others involved in this scheme, Dr. Pless specifically asked Dr. Petousis-Harris to address her “statement regarding the alleged role of aluminum binding to DNA fragments and subsequent effects.” (see copy of February 18, 2014 email attached- It was not about HPV L1 VLPs).
One cannot help but conclude that Dr. Pless intentionally put these two unrelated articles together and claimed that both articles studied HPV L1 gene DNA fragments in order to mislead the non-scientific readers and vaccination policy makers.
Click link above for full article/letter.
In case you have not heard, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a scientist and doctor, has written an open-letter of complaint to Dr. Margret Chan, the Director-General of theWorld Health Organization (WHO) alleging misconduct and cover up of HPV vaccine dangers by global health officials. The source of information for Dr. Lee’s letter is a trail of emails and other communication between global health officials obtained via an Official Information Request in New Zealand.
The trail of communications provides evidence that global health officials knew that HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix cause a dangerous inflammatory response greater than other vaccines but reassured the public that the HPV vaccines were safe, aided by a seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor. Read our post on these revelations to get the full story.
Dr. Lee asked us to post the entire trail of communications on our website for the entire world to see and review.
Please spread the word and look for yourself to see what these officials charged with protecting the public health are really up to.
Reports of official cover ups of vaccine dangers seem to be a recurring theme. Last year Dr.William Thompson a senior CDC scientist turned whistleblower revealed that he and other scientists and officials at CDC altered data in one of CDC’s studies to conceal the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. Then as detailed by Congressman Bill Posey in his official comments on the floor of the US House, this same group of scientists and officials met in a conference room and covered their tracks by destroying the documents.
Now comes news that health officials like Dr. Melinda Wharton of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as well as officials from Japan, other nations and the World Health Organization all participated in covering up the dangers of HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD, Director, Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, has submitted an official, open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. Margaret Chan, alleging gross misconduct, malfeasance and what potentially amounts to criminal behavior to mislead the global public regarding the safety of HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.
Dr. Lee’s lengthy letter detailing communications between global health officials documents that these officials knew that HPV vaccines cause an inflammatory reaction greater than other vaccines, yet reassured the public in official hearings and statements that the vaccines were safe, aided by a seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor.
Specifically, certain chemicals contained in the HPV vaccines have been demonstrated to trigger the release of cytokines or proteins called tumor necrosis factors (TNF) in the body. TNF cytokines can cause cell death. The release of TNF can also result in a wide range of reactions such as tumor regression, septic shock (serious whole-body inflammatory response that can result in dangerously low blood pressure and death), and cachexia (a wasting syndrome where the body loses weight, becomes fatigued, and muscles atrophy). Administration of TNF has been proven to cause death in humans and animals.
The chain of emails shows what appears to be attempts to conceal the truth, cover up the dangers, and generally mislead the public about what is and is not known about HPV vaccines and the dangers inherent to them.
The officials discuss how to respond to the safety concerns raised by legitimate scientific inquiry rather than how to ascertain the true extent of the dangers uncovered in the independent research.
Official statements appear to be a deliberate attempt to confuse the public into believing the safety concerns have been addressed in the peer-reviewed, published scientific literature when this is not the case. They imply that two different chemicals in the vaccines, HPV “virus like particles” and HPV DNA fragments are the same and that science has proven they are not dangerous but neither assertion is true. They are not the same and the only “science” is something ghost-written by CDC and a blogpost written by the aforementioned seemingly dishonest New Zealand doctor. Proof of this claim does not exist in the published, peer-reviewed literature.
The open letter, alleging what amounts to crimes against humanity if they are proven true, is a wake-up call to officials around the world. An immediate investigation must commence, and all HPV vaccines should be withdrawn from the market immediately.
In addition, all vaccines should be subjected to further review, and a Congressional investigation of CDC Whistleblower William Thompson must commence.
You can read Dr. Lee’s open letter to the WHO Director-General here.
You can read the entire chain of communications obtained by an Official Information Request in New Zealand here: Official Information Request Document.
By Dr. James Howenstine, MD.
December 7, 2003
Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of health declared, “the only safe vaccine is one that is never used.”
Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox. At the time this vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in the number of cases of smallpox. Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872. In 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination program. A stringent compulsory smallpox vaccine program, which prosecuted those refusing the vaccine, was instituted in England in 1867. Within 4 years 97.5 % of persons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. The following year England experienced the worst smallpox epidemic in its history with 44,840 deaths. Between 1871 and 1880 the incidence of smallpox escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000. The smallpox vaccine does not work.
Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been due to improvement in public health related to water quality and sanitation, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition, and higher standards of living. Typically the incidence of a disease was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. In England the incidence of polio had decreased by 82 % before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956.
In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated “Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”
There is a widely held belief that vaccines should not be criticized because the public might refuse to take them. This is valid only if the benefits exceed the known risks of the vaccines.
Do Vaccines Actually Prevent Disease?
Published by ruralkiller
By reading this you will get a little better understand of the UCC. Read it and impower yourself to a certain degree cause this document is only a a drop of water into a very big bucket !!
Published by: ruralkiller on Dec 29, 2012
Copyright: Attribution Non-commercial
This article has really filled in my “voids” that kept me from fully understanding things. I have found it to be one of the best discussions on the subject of freedom, and how our own Government has managed to take that freedom from us, all the while giving lip service to the Constitution. The title of the article is The UCC Connection. The author is noted as Howard Freeman. It is distributed by Americans for Constitutional Government, PO BOX 99, Lancaster, Ohio 43130. It also notes “without prejudice U.C.C. 1-207. And it is dated September 22nd 1991.(I do not know if reserving rights under U.C.C. 1-207 is a method of asserting “copyrights.” It is possible that the author did not want to use the conventional (c) as it might imply an implied contract with the US Patent Office, and thus the Federal Government. If this is the case, I apologize to Mr. Freeman, as I do not wish to infringe upon his rights.) Sincerely, Eric Gray sysop – The Desert Reef BBS firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com THE UCC CONNECTION – How To Free Yourself From Legal Tyranny by Howard Freeman (Originally published by the Oklahoma Freedom Council)
Consider Before Consent:
Please download this important leaflet and print off copies to raise awareness in your communities
New Zealand: http://www.ga-nz.com/
Ireland Pushes Back Against Gardasil Vaccine Program as Mainstream Media Reports on Real Vaccine Issues… http://ow.ly/WfiNh
Not too long ago, lethal infections were feared in the Western world. Since that time, many countries have undergone a transformation from disease cesspools to much safer, healthier habitats. Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s. The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and much more. Today, we are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and single-handedly prevented masses of deaths. But is this really true? Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, “What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?” Perhaps the best reason to know our history is so that the worst parts are never repeated.
“VACCINE FREE 2015” http://tinyurl.com/VaccineFree2015.
Host of “Public Advocate”, Sallie O. Ekordy
Petition to Congress: http://tinyurl.com/VaccineFree2015
Facebook Page: http://tinyurl.com/VaccineFreeNYC
A good place to start when researching vaccines would be to know what different types of vaccinations there are. The majority of early vaccinations fall into one of several types:
A vaccine that is considered ‘live’ but attenuated is one that contains the pathogen that causes the virus, with the potency of the pathogen greatly reduced. The virus remains live, but it’s altered so that it is somewhat harmless. Examples include the MMR vaccine, chicken pox, and Rotavirus vaccine.
Rather than keeping it live, the virus in an inactivated vaccine is grown and then killed before it is sold. Examples include polio, rabies, and Hepatitis A vaccines.
A subunit vaccine isolates one non-viral component, such as a protein, from a virus and uses it as a vaccine. Examples include flu shots, HPV, and Hepatitis B vaccinations.
Toxoid vaccines include inactivated bacterial toxins. Examples include pertussis (whooping cough) and tetanus vaccines.